-
September 21st, 2009, 02:18 PM
#21
I don't like opera, mainly the interface and the menu's are setup all confusing, as long as it's not a sys resource hog, no mem leaks is customizable and loads my pr0n then i'm happy.
Also it has to be able to let me have tons of toolbars more the better as we all know the more toolbars your browser has the better it must be.
-
September 21st, 2009, 03:30 PM
#22
I downloaded Google's Chrome over the weekend. The interface is nice, and I haven't come across any pages that it mangles yet. It does seem to be resource hungry though.
\"Those of us that had been up all night were in no mood for coffee and donuts, we wanted strong drink.\"
-HST
-
September 22nd, 2009, 11:50 PM
#23
chrome is resource hungry, but that is intentional. Each tab is like a completely separate browser.
You know how in firefox/opera/whatever, if you run into a screwed up page, it will crash the browser? In chrome, it only crashes the tab that page was in.
\"Ignorance is bliss....
but only for your enemy\"
-- souleman
-
September 23rd, 2009, 10:48 AM
#24
I used netscape when I was a kid. All browsers seem fast by comparison.
-
September 23rd, 2009, 08:54 PM
#25
Originally Posted by souleman
chrome is resource hungry, but that is intentional. Each tab is like a completely separate browser.
You know how in firefox/opera/whatever, if you run into a screwed up page, it will crash the browser? In chrome, it only crashes the tab that page was in.
I noticed that... Although FF is pretty good about reloading the tabs that you lost, but I understand Google's intentions... Not a bad idea really.
\"Those of us that had been up all night were in no mood for coffee and donuts, we wanted strong drink.\"
-HST
-
September 24th, 2009, 01:08 AM
#26
Originally Posted by westin
I noticed that... Although FF is pretty good about reloading the tabs that you lost, but I understand Google's intentions... Not a bad idea really.
The really only difference that i've noticed is that if the browser is left open for long periods of time with multiple tabs left open, Chrome seems to still stay responsive and not give that lagg effect, were as in FF it starts to get a lil lagg and the mem usage slowly get's higher and higher.
If they were able to control the whole mem leak and sys resource part FF could be a stable browser.
Similar Threads
-
By Black Cluster in forum General Computer Discussions
Replies: 0
Last Post: October 11th, 2005, 12:03 AM
-
By mmkhan in forum Security News
Replies: 1
Last Post: September 22nd, 2005, 01:06 PM
-
By Egaladeist in forum General Computer Discussions
Replies: 3
Last Post: September 9th, 2005, 10:40 PM
-
By SDK in forum Spyware / Adware
Replies: 12
Last Post: February 9th, 2005, 08:11 PM
-
By Remote_Access_ in forum Security Archives
Replies: 10
Last Post: January 12th, 2002, 05:02 PM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|