Applocker - windows 7 - Page 2
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: Applocker - windows 7

  1. #11
    Super Moderator: GMT Zone nihil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    United Kingdom: Bridlington
    Posts
    17,191
    Well to get back to the topic, if you look at the enthusiasm shown by Windows users fo UAC, I don't see this flying at all.

    Also consider most still log in as administrator, and many attacks are at the applications layer these days, where the application is already approved and running.

    Most Windows users don't want security..............I sometimes wonder how many could actually spell it

    And AV/Security products are here to stay.................if you hadn't noticed there is rather a lot of money to be made out of that sector
    If you cannot do someone any good: don't do them any harm....
    As long as you did this to one of these, the least of my little ones............you did it unto Me.
    What profiteth a man if he gains the entire World at the expense of his immortal soul?

  2. #12
    Only african to own a PC! Cider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Israel
    Posts
    1,683
    err ... so im in the right trade Nihil ???
    The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it.
    Albert Einstein

  3. #13
    Super Moderator: GMT Zone nihil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    United Kingdom: Bridlington
    Posts
    17,191
    It certainly looks that way given that OEMs bundle trial versions of security suites.

    One thing that has always amused me is that whilst Windows users don't seem to like UAC, least privilege accounts or locking down their systems they seem quite happy to buy security suites that frequently make their systems run like absolute dogs.

    Of course, from a corporate viewpoint it is a whole different ballgame. A lot of IT managers look on their AV suites as an insurance policy. Senior executives generally haven't much of a clue so if you don't have AV and you get hit, you will be fired.

    On the other hand, if you do have AV and you get hit you took the perceived required precautions so it wasn't your fault A case of job security rather than systems security
    If you cannot do someone any good: don't do them any harm....
    As long as you did this to one of these, the least of my little ones............you did it unto Me.
    What profiteth a man if he gains the entire World at the expense of his immortal soul?

Similar Threads

  1. Windows and lack of Email and Media clients
    By gore in forum Operating Systems
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: May 29th, 2009, 05:11 PM
  2. May 06 security patches
    By mohaughn in forum Microsoft Security Discussions
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: May 13th, 2006, 10:17 PM
  3. Replies: 6
    Last Post: October 5th, 2004, 08:26 AM
  4. Windows 2003 Server Vulnerability
    By warl0ck7 in forum Microsoft Security Discussions
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: August 14th, 2003, 12:23 PM
  5. OS History and other info.
    By Remote_Access_ in forum Security Archives
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: January 12th, 2002, 02:02 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

 Security News

     Patches

       Security Trends

         How-To

           Buying Guides