-
January 1st, 2010, 11:44 AM
#21
-
January 8th, 2010, 07:34 PM
#22
update: Soon you will be able to make free, untraceable GSM cell calls with a $40 device and a broadband connection. The device emulates a celltower. Should be good news for ATT and T-mobile users.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100108/...show_magicjack
-
January 8th, 2010, 09:04 PM
#23
I don't see why they have any right to object. Their service is not being used. I mean that would be like the cable company objecting to me viewing prerecorded media on my TV, or using a roof antenna. I own the TV and what I choose to put through it is none of their business. Same goes for the phone, unless the phone itself is part of a contract.
-
January 9th, 2010, 06:35 AM
#24
Originally Posted by JPnyc
I don't see why they have any right to object. Their service is not being used. I mean that would be like the cable company objecting to me viewing prerecorded media on my TV, or using a roof antenna. I own the TV and what I choose to put through it is none of their business. Same goes for the phone, unless the phone itself is part of a contract.
I would not have a problem paying magicjack. I heard they are trying to port it to unix\linux. Hell... I use linux way more than windows 7. Linux has virtualbox and other methods such as any VoIP app such as skype to beat that lil' circuit board. Att is sucking me good....why do I want to leave. Fvck.... I worked for them. Never bite the hands that feeds you even though you had to wait for a 2-week homeland security check and more weeks because your subcontractor is a spy for Israeal. Obama doesn't know about that yet.. hahahaha
Last edited by Linen0ise; January 9th, 2010 at 06:58 AM.
-
January 15th, 2010, 09:03 PM
#25
Originally Posted by Linen0ise
I thought the military worship encryption and high-grade software protection systems. How in the world can a $26 piece of software monitor satellite controlled drones? That new stealth predator is probably vulnerable also. Sad, Sad, Sad. Also means other things are can be intercepted. Damn shame.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1261...?mod=yhoofront
There are two entirely different systems in place, with entirely different requirements for security.
The control systems have not been broken. Those were the only portion protected.
The feeds CANNOT be encrypted. If they are, ground troops will no longer be able to use them, allied units will not be able to use them, and other necessary parties will not be able to use them. The security of the keys themselves and the classification levels of such things make sharing encrypted connections virtually impossible. Even encrypted landlines rarely cross international boundaries, let alone an easily attacked vehicle.
Real security doesn't come with an installer.
-
January 16th, 2010, 07:37 AM
#26
Originally Posted by D0pp139an93r
The feeds CANNOT be encrypted. If they are, ground troops will no longer be able to use them, allied units will not be able to use them, and other necessary parties will not be able to use them. The security of the keys themselves and the classification levels of such things make sharing encrypted connections virtually impossible. Even encrypted landlines rarely cross international boundaries, let alone an easily attacked vehicle.
The control link is controlled; I can understand that. The Data: Why did the government lie and say they were going to change things when me and you know that solder johnie cant run around programming codes and reprogramming after grunts unexpectly leave their posts. In reality, they fed the sheep and the new topic of today is Haiti. Thats what they want. The public has ADD. I know you can't reprogram every ammunition and gadget available. Let's drop it.
Last edited by Linen0ise; January 16th, 2010 at 07:50 AM.
Similar Threads
-
By Tiger Shark in forum The Security Tutorials Forum
Replies: 19
Last Post: May 29th, 2004, 04:55 PM
-
By Lone1337 in forum AntiOnline's General Chit Chat
Replies: 7
Last Post: August 23rd, 2002, 04:16 PM
-
By smirc in forum AntiOnline's General Chit Chat
Replies: 21
Last Post: June 7th, 2002, 04:03 PM
-
By zigar in forum AntiOnline's General Chit Chat
Replies: 10
Last Post: February 22nd, 2002, 02:24 PM
-
By NUKEM6 in forum Non-Security Archives
Replies: 1
Last Post: February 3rd, 2002, 11:28 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|