-
July 22nd, 2010, 03:20 PM
#11
Originally Posted by nihil
heh, you should read the article I posted about malware being more common on non-porn sites =P But on a more serious note, that is just the thing. I don't really go anywhere shady on my company's computer =P It was probably just firefox and windows being themselves (though I am still skeptical at best). The sites they were resolving were facebook, twitter and google. I don't really go on twitter so that is one that popped up as an issue. Does firefox inherently resolve these to caching purposes? Blech, it is all fixed now. It might have something to do with my companies network as well >.< They won't let me configure it, and the person who does configure it has no idea what he is doing but that is just politics.
Similar Threads
-
By cheyenne1212 in forum Miscellaneous Security Discussions
Replies: 7
Last Post: February 1st, 2012, 02:51 PM
-
By mikester2 in forum Firewall & Honeypot Discussions
Replies: 10
Last Post: January 14th, 2005, 01:24 PM
-
By avols143 in forum Operating Systems
Replies: 2
Last Post: July 5th, 2004, 02:55 AM
-
By newinnash in forum Newbie Security Questions
Replies: 7
Last Post: February 18th, 2004, 09:09 PM
-
By NullDevice in forum The Security Tutorials Forum
Replies: 21
Last Post: December 17th, 2003, 10:03 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|