-
July 28th, 2010, 08:49 PM
#1
Fake FF Update
There is a fake FireFox update doing the rounds:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/zd/20100728/tc_zd/253167
Would you buy a flash player from this man?
-
July 29th, 2010, 10:25 PM
#2
At first, I thought maybe there was an evilgrade module for it. It is amazing how much money there is in rogue AV software. I saw a report today saying that most people don't even try to contest the fraudulent charges...
\"Those of us that had been up all night were in no mood for coffee and donuts, we wanted strong drink.\"
-HST
-
July 30th, 2010, 12:15 PM
#3
I saw a report today saying that most people don't even try to contest the fraudulent charges...
Well, I suppose they were sucked in to start with and don't know it?
I guess there is a case for licences for paid AV vendors?
-
July 30th, 2010, 01:39 PM
#4
ggrrr why'd they blur out the url bar.
me keeps diggin..
-
July 30th, 2010, 01:50 PM
#5
this is actually devilishly clever. Despicable, but clever.
-
July 30th, 2010, 02:03 PM
#6
Originally Posted by JPnyc
this is actually devilishly clever. Despicable, but clever.
It's been done a few times in the past, people even go as far as submitting corrupt "Addons" and because when a developer submits an addon it automatically is allowed to be downloaded by users, but it carries a Warning message on the addon's description page, then once it's reviewed by the mozz dev's if it's found to be a "Corrupt" addon it get's removed straightaway, if it's clean then the warning message get's removed from the description page.
So the Attackers get a few hours/days to get there addon installed by as many "Victims" as they can get to install it before the addon get's pulled.
Turns out the url "Was" hxxp://www.newfirefoxonline.com
Last edited by HYBR|D; July 30th, 2010 at 02:06 PM.
-
July 30th, 2010, 09:08 PM
#7
I guess that is one of the "beauties" of open source..............it is based on trust?....................actually the whole of computing and the internet is as well...............
Shame about the scumbags isn't it?
Things have changed one hell of a lot since I wrote my first program in 1970
-
July 31st, 2010, 04:12 AM
#8
<offtopic>
What was the program Johnno? 1970.... punch cards would of been involved?
-
July 31st, 2010, 05:12 PM
#9
Yes, 80 column punched cards.............you submitted your job deck and waited 3 days to see what happened?
The first program was converting Fahrenheit/Centigrade, and the next one was all prime numbers up to 10,000.............
No "Hello World" back then
-
August 1st, 2010, 03:12 AM
#10
When you submitted the deck, what was done with it? Was it put into some special machine?
What happened if there was a mistake? Would you need to start from scratch and try with a new batch of cards?
was the 3 day waiting period due to low spec input machine, or due to the que being so long?
Similar Threads
-
By cheyenne1212 in forum Miscellaneous Security Discussions
Replies: 7
Last Post: February 1st, 2012, 02:51 PM
-
By Cider in forum Operating Systems
Replies: 10
Last Post: March 21st, 2006, 09:30 PM
-
By SDK in forum The Security Tutorials Forum
Replies: 2
Last Post: December 8th, 2005, 12:02 PM
-
By mohaughn in forum Microsoft Security Discussions
Replies: 1
Last Post: August 9th, 2005, 07:37 PM
-
By mohaughn in forum Microsoft Security Discussions
Replies: 2
Last Post: October 13th, 2004, 04:31 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|