Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 31 of 31

Thread: Windows 7 Won't boot

  1. #31
    Senior Member nihil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    United Kingdom: Bridlington


    You have had 10 years to get used to Windows XP............and support stops January 2014.

    Windows 8 will be released by then, so you might try get on the beta testing programme ............... a good way to learn IMO. I did beta testing for Windows 7.

    Everyone I know that has moved from XP to Windows 7 likes Windows 7 and doesn't want to go back. That was certainly NOT the case with Vista!

    I think that the only reason to stick with XP would be if you have legacy support issues or you are running on very old equipment.

    I have Windows 7 64bit running on a laptop with 3GB of DDR2/800 RAM, onboard graphics, and a 2.1GHz dual core processor, and it runs just fine. I have worked on a couple of similar boxes and the experience was equally impressive. Damn thing is so good my wife has confiscated it, and she is an XP user at work.

    On the other hand, I have Vista 32bit running on a 2.17GHz single core with 1.5GB of DDR1/400 & 333MHz RAM [Via VT400 chipset? it takes 400 in slot 0 and 333 in the other two] and a dedicated ATI graphics card with 256MB of DDR2 RAM. It pretty much runs like a dog, even with all the eye candy, bells, and whistles turned off.

    XP runs far better on machines of a lesser specification it would seem, although I haven't tried Windows 7 on a single core setup.............yet.

    I also don't believe that XP properly recognises and uses multicore processors in general computer use. Sure games, CAD, and graphics packages will do it, as they usually take over from the OS.

    If you think about it, XP is a 2001 OS and IIRC multicores didn't hit the streets 'til 2003, and then only in servers. You didn't really see them in quantity until late 2005/early 2006 when Vista was due out.

    I know that AMD have a program that is supposed to improve XP's performance with their multicores, and that Microsoft have one for Intel platforms. I would say that both of these are frigs rather than fixes.

    I did read a little while ago that Microsoft had announced Windows 7 TPC ("Thin PC") edition, which is supposed to let businesses continue with older hardware, amongst other things, like promoting Office 365?


    I would guess that they will do the same for Windows 8, which I don't expect to be any more demanding from a hardware viewpoint, or complexity of the UI.

    PS. Why am I getting this distinct aroma of SPAM??????????? and USA is USA, not usa, unless you would like me to spell china like that?
    Last edited by nihil; September 1st, 2011 at 07:21 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. October MS updates
    By mohaughn in forum Microsoft Security Discussions
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: October 13th, 2004, 04:31 AM
  2. Any requests?
    By gore in forum Operating Systems
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: August 8th, 2004, 05:21 AM
  3. The history of the Mac line of Operating systems
    By gore in forum Operating Systems
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: March 7th, 2004, 08:02 AM
  4. Evolution of a Linux User
    By gore in forum Tech Humor
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: October 1st, 2003, 08:53 PM
  5. Why is NT/2k so much more stable? Part 2/5
    By xmaddness in forum Other Tutorials Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: July 23rd, 2002, 12:00 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts