I keep reading posts that more or less have all the same basic ideas with a few exceptions. One side wants to disprove god (the christian one) with science and then the other argues back with biblical quotes and such. This arguement can not only not be won, but shouldnt really even be pursued. Why you ask?

well first of all, for fear of the answer... one way or the other would completely shatter the foundations of civilization. This is all beside the point considering we will never know until actually do go up to that spirit in the sky (or not, depending)

but the biggest problem with it is the arguement is over two *man-made* interpertations of their world. Any specific religeon is a belief system created by man. No matter how you cut it, even if moses spoke to god it was still his, and his followers interpertations of what was said. even if there really was a jesus, it's still the interpertations of those who knew him. No one really knows for sure if those things happened, they are theories. And as far as science goes well it is a simple fact of science that nothing is known or fact. science fundamentaly betrays itself with that principle. Evolution is still a theory, the fact that a lot of people belive it just makes it a very popular one. a thousand years ago it was a very popular theory that the earth was flat. Theres no difference.

The point im trying to make with all this hot air is that we're arguing two theories, one that is ever changing and never certain (science) and one that is just very old and dated and if it were to be thought of today would be laughed at by most people (christianity). I think we should stop arguing over sombodies ideas. Another arguement that i find interesting (and better than do you belive in god) is do you have any faith at all? Science is the more robust theory, so i would like to know how closely the scientists and biologist stick to they're theories. Or if they have their own beleifs seperate from evolution and religeous (as i do)?