Ok Let's lay off the whole conspiracy theory for once. Eh?

This is not about supression. This is about the "third party" not being able to garner enough support to sustain it's election bids. Now, I won't deny that news stations and papers will normally endorse one party, or another, by way of their actions/reporting/editorials. But there is no concerted effort to suppress "third parties." The effort is to suppress anything that is not good for the party the news agency supports.

If the "third party" can gain enough support, the news agencies will report it. A good example of this was Ross Perot.