well, thats not what i mean, i just dont think i'll have much luck messing with their soruce code. i dont expect i'll be able to find the "image extraction portions" easily and even if i did i have no idea how to compile something thats supposed to be an iso image.

i think im gonna go with g4u, it looks like g4l is a bs copy of g4u, then again the g4u guy could just be being a jerk, i cant really tell if his arguments are valid... http://www.feyrer.de/g4u/g4l