All right, so the intent is what matters rather than the outcome of it. But that makes all of my examples with good outcomes be immoral, wouldn't it?

My comment on ignorance should have been obvious as a joke
Yes, I know. I'm using it as an example, ironically enough.

that, it [morality] is again [based on], intent ( persay )
But morality is a lot like advice, you judge it based off of the outcome rather than its intent. For example, Don Quixote intended to slay giants, instead he tilted the windmills. The former would be noble, the latter is madness. So how should we look at DQ, as a saint or a screwball?

Philosophy/theology is like any course of study...the only difference is that with philosophy/theology most people assume they can simply form opinions without having to study
Meh, I would have said the difference would be that everyone is simultaneously right and wrong, whereas other fields its "either/or".

the best you can offer is an opinion based upon a foundation of ignorance , with no more validity than my advice/opinions on computer forensics, as an example.
But you are assuming that I haven't studied, which is a pretty big leap. I have studied a few philosophers myself, and find this suggestion mildly amusing (no offense).