Hi,

I am neither anti estab nor non anti estab. I just think MS are headed in a direction which will include security but is not security up to the eyebrows in the way we would like to see it.

And I agree with the last poster about making people aware but... here's the stupid part...some companies are making security their selling point e.g. AOL advertised that you could switch on antivirus, firewall, parental control etc. My question is: why - apart perhaps from the last one - would you want to make any of those optional?

Rutynezne