|
-
August 31st, 2007, 01:05 PM
#18
aardpsymon: I doubt that it was a lot warmer 400 years ago as we where i nthe midst of a mini ice age then...the little freez, caused a lot of bad (and soem good) things like the french revolution. basicly you got your dates wrong...1000 years ago was the Medival warming period, where it was warmer (RCD of the sargaso sea show that the seas temp was about 1C warmer then). these are irrelivant ot the curent discuession though as they where both regional occurances. both temperature changes only happend in the northern hemisphe no signs of drasticly idfrent temperatures world wide like we see in a true ice age or the truly global warmign that we are seeing now.
and generaly speaking they get the weatehr report right, you just don't understand it (take chance of rain for instance, they say a 20% chance of rain...that actualy means that it will be raining over 20% of the area that they cover)
Who is more trustworthy then all of the gurus or Buddha’s?
Similar Threads
-
By Egaladeist in forum AntiOnline's General Chit Chat
Replies: 0
Last Post: October 18th, 2005, 01:37 AM
-
By MURACU in forum Tech Humor
Replies: 1
Last Post: November 17th, 2004, 03:39 AM
-
By Madseel in forum AntiOnline's General Chit Chat
Replies: 1
Last Post: September 24th, 2003, 12:20 PM
-
By [WebCarnage] in forum Cosmos
Replies: 5
Last Post: May 20th, 2002, 07:18 PM
-
By Noble Hamlet in forum AntiOnline's General Chit Chat
Replies: 1100
Last Post: March 17th, 2002, 09:38 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|