The Great Security Backlash
"Security" has been a kind of buzz word ever since Microsoft decided to try and convince the world that security is an issue that they intend to address. Whether they've actually done anything about this is debatable I guess. But I think it's fair to say that the security issues have really been in the spotlight over the past year.
In the establishment of new technologies/ideas there tends the initial buzz followed by a backlash because people tend to get sick of hearing everyone singing the praises of this wonderful new "thing" and decide to actually question what's going on. More often than not people become skeptical and over critical of the new technology.
If the technology has any real value it will usually get past this phase. Things start to settle down and people accept it for what it is.
Or it all falls on its ass. People come to their senses and decide that enough is enough. So they put an end to the fad.
Now that the Microsoft-induced haze is beginning to clear some other schools of thought are coming across. Here's an example I read recently.
Quote:
Considering all possible threats is a nice, creative process, but there is little evidence to suggest its practical benefit, other than funding of security-related projects that may not be needed. So, in many ways, it wastes resources. ~Eric Shaw - ex-CIA
And what about this.
Quote:
most businesses already had quite adequate security systems in place and personnel trained to deal with incidents. ~Dr Peter Tippett - Norton security products inventer
Is it just me or are we seeing the start of a backlash against the "let's be more security-focused" buzz? Anyways, here's the links that I got these quotes from. Check it out.
Security myths costing firms
Warning on Cyberattack 'Exaggerated'