Printable View
Now if the RECIEVER could specify, in their response, to not allow a response to their response (i.e. "close the thread"), then the hidden flame wars would become moot....and if it turns to a logical discussion, the RECIEVER could opt for the hidden "thread" to continue.(or you could just PM each other). After thinking over it again, it's a very plausible idea, given the proper guidelines.
Ouroboros
Sorry all I ment a home button not back it was late and too many:drink:Quote:
Originally posted by thor
Terr,
You know you have my support on this..:cool:
edit: Also it would be nice to have a back button on the bottom of the page..
Thank's thor:)
I like this idea. Gets my vote hands down. Earlier today I got negative antipoints, quote "I don´t like yer avatar, makes me wanna punch yer ****ing mouth loose". Nice constructive use of antipoints :) (If you gave me the antipoints, and are reading this, s'ok I forgive you, you got 'issues' see a therapist).
:D
I think it's a good idea except for the fact that there is a reason why some people accumulate large amounts of negative points. Negative antipoints aren't the best way to constructivly critisize someone. Let's say I negatively antipoint someone because they are being abusive.
reply* Get F***** F**
Doesn't really help.
I think it would be a great idea to have a reply to feature. I think you should only be able to reply once though, and the anti-point giver shouldn't be able to reply back unless it is by PM.
When I post news I keep getting this idiot who gives me anti-points saying something along the lines of "put your thoughts a monkey can copy and paste news". What the guy doesn't realize is usually after I post the news articles I go back and reply with my thoughts. The article he gave me anti-points on all he had to do was scroll down 1 reply, and my thoughts were there. Another thing he many not realize is I am at work and just may not have an hour to kill going back and putting my thoughts on all of them. For crying out loud, I am posting news, don't give me anti-points if it doesn't meet your criteria.
Hopefully he reads that, but if not I hope we get the reply to feature so he will. :)
Hello Terr!
Good day to you! Nice site proposal there! That proposed function of yours can serve important purposes:
1) If a person receives a bad comment and negative points. He/she has the chance to explain further or justify her post/reaction on the thread to the giver of the negative point his/her side.
2) If a person receives +points, specially if it's from someone anonymous. The receiver of the +point will have the chance to say "Thanks."
However, when the giver of the negative antipoints has made some nasty comments. Specially, if the remarks made was not within the scope of the issue/topic(s) posted on the board. The possible result: The negative antipoint receiver responds back to the giver in a hostile approach. Thereby, an unending bickering between the two parties may take place.
Definitely it is a good idean. Keep-up the good work!!!
________________________Quote:
A blessed day to all!!!
"I expect to pass through life but once. If, therefore, there be any kindness I can show, or any good thing I can do for any fellow being, let me do it now… as I shall not pass this way again. " ~William Penn
a reply-to-comment would be nice....
I think it would be a good idea to have a reply-to feature.
So what makes this so different from what I suggested?
And you shat all over that.
I won't even go into the comments I've recieved just recently, but lets just say I'm getting followed around by someone who loves CP FW-1 and doesn't like the fact I don't use it or like it.........
Anyway. Antipoints don't mean crap cause the system is so badly abused.
it is being abused... i get neg points for replying to peoples posts on a thread that i started