Not trying to flame. :)
Quote:
I agree, but the crackers keep the security guys in bussines and viseversa. When a program is cracked, the company is searching for better security software
Which increases the cost of the product. And having to deal with people who don't pay for it.
Quote:
Second, I think company's don't lose that much money in security that the quality of the program goes down. Companies DO NOT spend more time securing there programs then improving them. That's just apsolutly insane. If companies would do that, they would be out of bussines.
Well, you said in the previous quote that they are searching for better security software. And no they don't spend more time securing their software than improving them, I don't think I said that did I?
Quote:
Third, I ment that the money I spend for a program is only a small portion of all the buyers combined. If I would start buying all of my software, I would have a lot less of it and my money would not make any difference for the company.
Do you really think you are the only one who does it? You probably don't, if you have some sense. Your money does make a difference; but don't think of it as just you. Think of say, 20 people getting a $300 for free compared to paying for it. That is a $6,000 loss, as the company would see it.
Side Note:
Not trying to flame. It is as you said your Opinion and beliefs. And my ethics comment wasn't directed at you, it was more of a general statement. Any how, I am done here.