his statement makes me laugh, of course he was attracted to young girls when he was 16, he'd be a perv if he was attracted to older woman.
i seriously wondering though, is there a defence for people who collect porn (nice or not nice not being the issue ) and have pics of underage girls who are passing for 18. i mean tracy lords was only 15 or 16 when she started making porn flicks, or would someone get 20 yrs for being in possession of someone elses lie?
If your browsing the internet how many can say they've never been redirected to or clicked on a link they've thought was one thing and it turned out to be porn and if one of those images was from a girl who only said she was 18...well technically you've downloaded it ? what are the ramifications of this?
