Microsoft claims this crap about no bugs but yet Windoz 9x is based on the MS-DOS operating system which in turn makes the
system unstable (hence the famous blue screen of death). If there are no bugs, then why did the blue screen of death become
so famous? I changed to Linux for the fact that it is stable, cheap and TRULY made for the people. This is my personal
opinion, but I think a community of millions of people working on code can and will make software more stable. Consider this
also, If you run into a supposidly unexisting windoz bug, you can't patch it yourself. With open source, you can go into the
code and change it yourself. Don't get me wrong, Satan Gates... I mean Bill Gates will have the upper hand on operating
systems until Linux is more user friendly for the average user. Until this happens, (or he gets forced to go open source) I will be
forced to have a version of Windoz for some programs I cannot use under Linux. Anyways, I'm getting off my point of Windoz
cannot be bug proof. Just how in the hell can Gates think that million lines of code will be bug proof? That is funny.
