Which bank????? J/K.....
Printable View
Which bank????? J/K.....
lol hehe
dont think so. If anyone were to rob it Id be the FIRST one they looked at as Ive pointed this out before.
I tried compiling that code too and ran into issues, but havent sat down to really look it over yet
I really REALLY appreciate you guys taking the time and lending me a hand with this code. Atleast I'm not the only one having problems with this code. I too am running Slackware but it's v8.1. Anyways, I guess I'm gonna have to buy a book on C to figure out why this junk isn't compiling properly.
my girlfriend thanks all you guys too, for helping me be a "bigger dork" ... hmph thanks guys
keep in mind that this exploit is only usefull if you are associated with the Access Point, meaning you are still gonna have to either hack WEP or MAC Filters, maybe both to gain access to the WLAN before you can actually get this info. It would be possible for an attacker to get physical access to your wired network and send a broadcast out (this exploit) asking for all your wireless access points info. So a possible security measure would be to place a firewall or router between your WLAN and LAN keeping the broadcast domains seperate.
Thanks again guys
BINGO,
The exploit on that website wasn't spaced properly! I found another copy of the exploit on the web which would compile and execute properly, when comparing the two, the only difference was the spacing... LOL
C and C++ are not space sencitive!!!
take a look at some of the source codes on this website !!
But I don't have the time to look into it atm..
I think there must have been some other small difference . .
holy crap! That is a very interesting site, so I'll go out on a limb and say that it may not of been spacing which caused the compiling problem. However, I'm betting it is a formatting problem somewhere along the code, because I've typed in that code from the secureiteam.com website character by character and it compiled and executed.
Note that both versions of the code gave the compiler a fit with the "sendto" statement something about illegal pointer.
I'll take a look at the code tonight, we shall get to the bottom of this!
lata