Printable View
the fact is a computer is not a human, so it seems foolish to try to program it to think like one, my opinion is you must teach it first to learn from stimuli and then interact with it like it is a human, teaching it not to think like a human, but to interact with humans as if it does.
nah, then you get another dumb robot. Lots of those around, just check any university website.
Sequential processing isn't fast enough, so you need to fake referential networking. the complex bit is the continual self-adjustment of the database to develop subgroupings to filter the concepts through.
Yep, My T-X does all these things and it also travels through time and kills people.
I suspect that one day it will get to big for its boots and start a thermo nuclear war or something
I am not purposing that writing a program that can interpret language is writing a program that is intelligent, I'm simply saying you need an interface before you can teach it anything.
*nod* granted, but you need the interface to process the information correctly, as well as store it correctly. That way, it will end up teaching itself. Otherwise, you've hit a dead end. You can easily end up with a huge vocabulary, but it wont have any way of referencing inputs... other than a very slow sequential search through the database, for each component. My way, you're already referencing complete concepts.
thats, just it, how do you teach it to build INTELLIGENT sentences, not just sentences. that is the real challenge
By not building sentences word by word. It's like building a brick wall by making each brick from scratch. Rather build a store of complete bricks and assemble the bricks as you need them.
We do a lot less base thinking than we realise. Most of our interaction with the world is pre-set responses. 'Learning' is just accumulating a store of those responses and linking them.
ya, I read somewhere a long time ago about someone attempting to create an online artificial intelligence by feeding massive amounts of logical statements into a search-engine type program, such as "apples are red" and "when you die you stay dead" and hundreds of very simple little logical statements a day for a few years, and soon they had a program that was actually rather coherent, but not artificial intelligence, I suppose that after one writes a program that can build correctly formatted speech, the next step would be to feed alot of logical concepts into it, to sort-of give it a sense of coherence.
(going to bed, be back in a few hours)
Well, the next step is the app has to continually edit the database, somehow with the links... essentially building a filter system to clump the concepts (at least, from the outside)
Perhaps a front-end (sort of like the motor cortex) to cut input into manageable chunks. And to make sure the output is logical.
Sleep well.
Mmm i already have artifical intelligence, My Brunette girlfriend died her hair blond(and that would be :q!)or maybe esc,tab,:q!?