Those women 20 years ago: "Arnold groped me!!! Oh my god!!! He really did it!!! The real Ahnuld!!!"
Those women now: "I'm devastated :( ... I can't handle this... some dirty man groped me!!!"
Printable View
Those women 20 years ago: "Arnold groped me!!! Oh my god!!! He really did it!!! The real Ahnuld!!!"
Those women now: "I'm devastated :( ... I can't handle this... some dirty man groped me!!!"
:rofl:
That is the truth. One of the women that came forward about this worked for the ex governor. lol
This whole thing is funny to me.
Now that wasn't very nice... Are you a part of the Schwartzenegger fan club? I live in California and voted for Arnold but i dont need to go into some kind of rant about Operating Systems because someone insulted the new governer.Quote:
Originally posted here by Star****ers|Inc
And why exactly would Arnold be an *idiot*? I'd love to hear some of this...you one of those people who goes around saying Windows sucks w/out having a reason and think you're 1337 cause you can run a llama *nix like RedHat or Mandrake? =P Did you see who else was running? Arnold was the best choice of any of those gimps, better recognize :D
Star****ers|Inc
rofl...no, I'm not part of any fan club for anyone except the common sense club where I personally honor any and all who adhere to the strict *think for yourself policy* which was enacted the day I was conceived. And what he posted, it's not that he wasn't thinking for himself, he just plain wasn't thinking - he hasn't replied now has he? I don't mind if you have your own views/opinions about anything, as long as you have a reason to have them, don't spout off if you can't back up your ideas.
Star****ers|Inc
Can any man here actually say with out a doubt that in their entire life they have never put their hand on a woman's ass? And treated every woman with chivalry and honor that only King Arthur would be proud of? I am not saying its right, I am saying he said ya I wasn't the perfect guy and I am sorry.
Now those who want to compare this to Clinton let's take a look, here is a citizen perspective:
Arnold supposedly groped a woman on a set of a movie. Not exactly the Christian church setting but OK, he may have done some bad things there in his hot tub I am sure.
Clinton had a blow job on his desk in OUR oval office and then took a Cigar, a nasty cigar and shoved it up and ugly woman’s (you get the picture) and Monica isn't even cute! OK so the guy likes sex, so do I - allot. But any CEO in this country that was caught having sex with a subordinate would be railroaded and SUED. The golden rule is “Don’t dip your pen in company ink.”
And this Flowers girl could gag a maggot. Oh and then let's not forget about the semen stains and DNA testing. It was only then that Clinton quit lying, he was had dead to rights. It was HIS *** stain. The only reason I kind of joined the bandwagon against him is because it was friggin embarrassing. I thought he was an ok pres. I think he cut too much military spending but I didn’t hate the guy. Hatred is another topic I am formulating by the way.
Arnold had a large percentage of women vote for him. The people have spoken. I hope ANYONE who gets elected to office does a good job, that's democracy in action. Some people try to twist and subvert that process in this country.
Not saying that Arnold didn't grope anyone, after all he did make a public apology for something to this effect, but these tabloids have been around for the last thirty years so why didn't they speak up sooner and sue him?
Paulie: the tabloids have been talking about his behavior for years, his treatment of women has been very well documneted by the tabloids, but main stream media hasn't cared about how a actor treats women...they do care about how a politition dose. I just can't understand the hipocracy inharent in the right, its bad for clinton to have extramarital afferis but it makes arnold one of the guys? that just dosn't work for me.
First of all, has Arnold indeed committed adultry with anyone?
Secondly, who is even willing to stand and defend Bill Clinton anymore?
Personaly felt clinton wasnt that bad, gave my wife a pay raise first president to do that in years (she was in the navy), took care of the troops while screwing the defense contractors, kept taxes undercontroll while the econamy blossemd...sure he had bad taste in women but so what...
as for Arnold..well the worst of the stories haven't hit main stream media but pulling up womens shirts so he can take pictures of their breasts, groping their breasts and forceing his hands inside their panties has hit the press...a lot of this happened up throuh 200 at least when he was married...so yes that would be *very* close to adultery.. now thatis what have heard of in the main stream...the tabloids are full of arnold sex stories over the years but those need t obe taken with a grain of salt,
The tabloids constantly produce media concerning Elvis sightings 3 headed babies, alien pregnancies, and mummies that can play the piano. In fact everyone, I mean everyone with some small bit of popularity and celebrity status is portrayed as a spouse beating, sex craved, drug addicted sociopath. In fact; just this morning a saw no less than two with Hilary's secret lover list on it and how upset Bill is over his wife's payback. I find them amusing while waiting in line for a pack of chick lets.
The door of hypocrisy swings both ways. The media did have information on Arnold before the last few days of the election, so I think they held it until it could do the most damage. Thus aligning what should be an objective view in public news, with a political party. In my opinion, having been subjected to the cold war, this is socialistic style censorship. The hypocrisy is; a lot of Republicans are saying that it’s no big deal while they berated Clinton. Sure Clinton was in office already, etc. But it's still hypocrisy. At the same time a lot of republicans voted for Tom, so I guess not everyone is a hypocrite.
But I am inclined to say the door swings a little to the left after California's recall. Calls were being put out on the street asking for anyone to come forward who thinks they "could" have been improperly treated by Arnold over his life time. No formal charges are filed and the one's he has admitted to and apologized for have come from over 30 years ago. He seems to be genuinely honest and willing to do a great job in office. Unfortunately not everyone likes that and some powerful people will seek to destroy him for having the audacity to have been ELECTED BY THE PEOPLE. Where is the real conspiracy and threat to democracy?
At the same time everyone in the party was defending Clinton with anything they could possibly come up with. There was hard evidence and every tricky hand that could be played was tried. Even after the "stain" was tested, the media protected him. Now the same people try and destroy a candidate running for office based on allegations and the media went wild. Hypocrisy swings BOTH ways but leans heavier on the left.
Now if Arnie is convicted of something; that would change my opinion of him. If he is caught using his cigar in an "inappropriate" manner, that too could change my opinion of him. Hell if he has the audacity to expect me to take the line "define sexual relations" then all bets are off with that dude. But I would also judge how good a leader he is too. Clinton has already proved that civil cases can’t be brought against some one in office, not sure if that also applies to governors. But if what he did is criminal then, like stated, that’s another story.