considering I've been here since the 90's...yes before the site was yellow..I gotta say 2002 was a bad year.
Printable View
considering I've been here since the 90's...yes before the site was yellow..I gotta say 2002 was a bad year.
From what I've seen I agree but :
Quote:
Most users ever logged on was:
1419 at 10:12 AM 07-08-2002
Yeah..when JP was busy pimping the site so he could sell it
OMG ~~ I thought I was in a time warp or something.
Except for 3 (or so) topics on my front page.......they were all from 2002.
I agree with hogfly, dump the 'Bump Up' feature.
(Pretty strange to come back after a couple of months absence and find everything reverted to 2002.)
<Insert some strong language here, cursing the one who keeps bumping old posts.>
Suggestion: Only allow addicts to bump up old posts and display the name of the last person who bumped in the index. Or disable this feature.
Can't see any need for the bump feature. If a thread is going to be resurrected it should be via a new post. If it's justified then no probs if it's a BS post then the poster is identifiable and can be negged.
If someone just wants to find an ol post then that's what the search page is for.
In the bin with it!
d0pp
I have been studying your avatar................
If you do not change hands after 99 strokes you will go blind my friend :eek: :D
;)
I trust that I might be indulged a little "English" humour?
"I don't Bump No More with no Big........"
I say dump the bump..
BTW: I thought the Bumpers name was listed with the time of bumping..
All,
Only one thing I can say .... Dump the Bump!
It's really annoying to open a thread only to find that it is 2 years old.
Cheers,
BrainStop
make an AP toll for bumping :P