Suprisingly that smells of a cows ass eating prairie grass.Quote:
Suprisingly the us kills more then terrorist in good name and intent
Printable View
Suprisingly that smells of a cows ass eating prairie grass.Quote:
Suprisingly the us kills more then terrorist in good name and intent
"Terrorism: the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion."Quote:
I've got to say it... we are dealing with an enemy that wouldn't think twice about pouring a toxin into a milk truck at a gas station to kill perhaps thousands of mothers and their children.
-http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=terrorism
catch
Ordering someone or personally walking into a crowd of people and detonating a bomb serves no other purpose than to terrorize and coherce your victims. In a modern sense those you wish to control. Good thing we feed them Honey Glazed Chicken.
That is true, however. It is not necessary to kill to terrorize. Any action that induces fear is good enough, especialy if you can induce fear in a whole community. The threat is far more effective as a tool for terror than direct action. Direct action just produces an equal reaction.Quote:
Ordering someone or personally walking into a crowd of people and detonating a bomb serves no other purpose than to terrorize
nabylbt
Blue on blue and collateral, is a by product of war that is unavoidable. The only way to avoid these is not to go to war. If this was the case, I would probably be speaking German and roadclosed would probably be speaking Japanes. :D
Like Kidnapping civilians and parading them on TV and making them plead to their family, ethnic group, culture, society to help them by giving in to demands? Good thing we let them have their bibles.Quote:
Any action that induces fear is good enough,
Yes like that, also like fabricating unsubstantiated risks to thousands of mothers and children. Especially when the verbiage is particularly graphic, the numbers exaggerated, and the victim is so carefully selected and isolated to maximize fear.Quote:
Like Kidnapping civilians and parading them on TV and making them plead to their family, ethnic group, culture, society to help them by giving in to demands?
catch
They are a very intelligent lot.
Those are exactly the methods that are the most affective. They scare the beeejeesus out of everyone who sees them. (if that is not terorrism, then," I am a Bannana"[1])Quote:
Like Kidnapping civilians and parading them on TV and making them plead to their family, ethnic group, culture, society to help them by giving in to demands
This is the only thing I can think of that I respect, Margerate Thatcher for, ( or at least her government). The absolute refusal to give into terorrism of any kind. Her government paid the price for that stance but kept too it.
[1] Ian Hislop...............I forget the details, but he had to pay **** loads of money for something he published.
Another thing that you can respect her for is the fact she didnt feed off terrorisim or use it to control her voters. It is one thing that the English or French or Spanish never done and that was to induce a constant threat enviroment based on terrorist actions. Then again England didnt need terrorist to frighten anyone they had Thatcher. Brrrrrr :p
edit :
Just to highlight the point here is a news article from the bbc on a part of the patriot act being questioned.
The really interesting comment comes at the end of the articleQuote:
Powers to gather information on the books people buy in US bookshops and rent from libraries should be repealed, the House of Representatives has said.
Here is the full story sourceQuote:
But Assistant Attorney General William Moschella lambasted the amendment in a letter to Congress.
"[Bookshops and libraries] should not be carved out as safe havens for terrorists and spies, who have, in fact, used public libraries to do research and communicate with their co-conspirators," he wrote.
.
So all you US citizens watch what you read because Uncle Sam sure does.......
"[Bookshops and libraries] should not be carved out as safe havens for terrorists and spies, who have, in fact, used public libraries to do research and communicate with their co-conspirators,"
How lucky for us that terrorists are so selectively intelligent.
Smart enough to using bio-warfare against the nations milk supply.
Too dumb to buy their books on cash.
Why would terrorists even have bank account or credit cards? Isn't their goal to stay off the grid? Especially their spending habits?
I know, maybe every copy of "Terrorism for Dummies" they buy gives them double frequent flier miles on their credit cards.
cheers,
catch