Actually RAID10 doesn't exist.. But in reality RAID1+0 is usually refered to as RAID10..
I love RAID.. I've seen some really weird configs... RAID10 spread across multiple controllers.. A nightmare to configure.. Mostly done for performance reasons in heavy duty I/O applications..
Sort of yes. You first create 1 stripeset then mirror that stripeset.. If one drive fails you can rebuild the faulty stripeset using it's mirror.. Heck.. you can have 2 faulty drives.. As long as they're in the same stripeset..Quote:
The issue would be with the data drives?............you could hotswap the mirrored drives, but you would have to rebuild the striped part of the array?
[RAID Contr1]-----[Disk1]----[Disk3]
[RAID Contr2]-----[Disk2]----[Disk4]
Disk1+2 in RAID0 and Disk3+4 are the striped mirror of Disk1+2..
Both disk 1 and 2 can die without problems or dataloss. Same with 3 and 4.. But if 1 and 4 dies.. it's restoring your backup time!
2x300 in RAID1 for OS.. 4x300 in RAID10 (1+0) for data.. makes 6 in total..Quote:
When you say "6 drives" I am guessing that you are talking the data drive side of the array?
Like mirrored = 2 x 300 + 2 x 300 = 600 total, and the two striped drives are 2 x 300 = 600?
It is expensive indeed.. OTOH drives aren't that expensive anymore.. And some applications can really benefit from the increased I/O throughput (sticking in a bigger cpu and/or more ram is useless in some cases).. while still maintaining fault tolerance...Quote:
Very interesting!............I have never met anyone who would pay for that
