well I did change a few of the #'s and that is one that I changed, so it is not correct, but I'm sure w/ the correct # in there it would be.
Printable View
well I did change a few of the #'s and that is one that I changed, so it is not correct, but I'm sure w/ the correct # in there it would be.
Can you post your exact route table? Its not really very helpful if you change it!!
Of course change a digit or two or your external IP but if you can help it dont change anything else. you can PM it to me if you dont want to post it.
It could be one of two things, when your router gets a packet for an internet address (ie one that is not in its routing table) it does not know what to do with it so just drops the packet. Or yours and your ISP encapsulation is different (phone your ISP up for this).
Can you configure your switch or is it not that type of switch?
No I cannot configure the switch I am currently on. here is the exact routing table again:
Gateway of last resort is 70.186.123.1 to network 0.0.0.0
70.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 70.186.123.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1
172.19.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
S 172.19.25.22 [254/0] via 70.186.123.1, FastEthernet0/1
C 192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
S* 0.0.0.0/0 [254/0] via 70.186.123.1
My friend also thought it might be the encapsulation, but I am not sure how to check that nor how to fix it, if that is it. If you can ping outside addresses while consoled into the router, but not from a pc on the inside of the router, would that still point to an encapsulation problem?
Why use RIP? There's only one router and both networks are directly connected...
Don't you need NAT to translate your RFC-1918 192.168.1.x addresses to your Internet address(es) 70.0.0.x?
Can you ping the default gateway from the cisco?
SirDice: I believe that he does need nat.
At least, that's how I have mine configured on my 831...
On the external interface, use "ip nat outside"
On the internal interface, use "ip nat inside"
Then use
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 externalinterface permanent
obviously, replace whatever your external interface is with the one in the above command.
My config is seriously bloated because I have QoS and VPN setup along with some pretty lengthy ACLs for various services, interfaces... but I can remove all that "junk" and post my config. Though, my config will be slightly different because I'm using aDSL and not cable.
I do have another Cisco 806 that I can configure on one of my cable connections and then post the config...
I will try the NAT commands that you posted, but phishphreek80, if you could hook that cisco 806 up to one of your cable connections and then post the config, that would be VERY helpful. I hope and am sure you will be more successfull than I have been at getting it to work. Thanks for the help. By the way, does that 806 have dual ethernet ports?
Try out those commands... it *should* work for you. I won't have time to configure up the 806 until late this weekend. I've already got a booked schedule and I have no time for "fun". So, if you don't have yours working by then, I'll do it.
Yes, it is a broadband router. It has a eth0 and eth1 for wan and lan. However, my eth0 gets reasigned to Dialer0 (which is a virtual interface) because I'm on DSL. If I were only using cable, then there would be no need for the Dialer0 virtual interface.Quote:
does that 806 have dual ethernet ports?
I originally started with an 806 but quickly outgrew it. I've upgraded to an 831, but again, I'm outgrowing it. I'd like to get an 870 series... but I don't want to shell out the $ again. I've spent more $ on routers than any other hardware.
Check out the 800 series for more info.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps380/
I tried those commands, and they did not work for me. I was under the impression that you only needed those nat commands if you were going to do port forwarding? Not sure. That is cool about not being about to set up the cisco 806 to cable until late weekend. Do you think you could go ahead and shoot me your config from the 831 on DSL to tide me over? Thanks.
Hey I got it figured out. after I put in the NAT statements, I had to create an ACL and apply it to the external interface, (access-list 102 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any) now it is passing traffic. Thanks for all of your all's help!!