I thought these needed reitteration
Quote:
Originally posted here by foxyloxley
In 1916 in one morning Britain lost SIXTY THOUSAND troops [The Somme]
American losses are [militarily speaking] irrelevant ........
America took an entire country in a matter of DAYS, with losses in the '00s.
No military EVER has had the capability to do this, and the insurgency is just a natural consequence of those who now have nothing to stop for.
They can be stopped quickly, but the cost [to Iraqi's] would be EXTREMELY high, and would entail utilising Soviet tactics, something that the US military has never considered.
War IS hell, and people die.
but in this war, the numbers are so low, that we [home based civillians] are in danger of losing perspective on this, and we need to remember the MILLIONS that died in the major wars / conflicts of the 20th century alone, to remind ourselves how lucky we are that we still have personnel who are prepared to 'walk the walk'
In a few days we [UK - not sure if it's done in the US ?] shall remember the dead with the wearing of a poppy.
that day is November 11th, as it was at the 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month in 1918 that WWI finally ended.
and we are still killing each other :confused:
Quote:
Originally posted here by OverdueSpy
Overall the U.S. Military recruiting outlook is not really all that bleak. Yeah there are some rocky points alond the path, but that is to be expected anytime the military is engaged in an active conflict.
http://usmilitary.about.com/od/joini...cruitgoals.htm
Even if 40% of the troops over there are actually reserve, that's not a bad thing necessarily. That's the entire point of reserve. They are used when the primary force needs numbers. Reservists are aware of this when they sign, and should expect to serve the country as they promised to.