I might be reading the situation incorrectly, but I think that the message is that you can protect your intellectual property so long as you don't prevent legitimate competition.Quote:
Not sure how forcing on online company developed for a certain device to work with other devices is fair in a free society
It sounds very similar to the EU rulings against HP and their ink cartridges? I guess that the message is that you can make iPods, and that is your intellectual property, and your iTunes are also yours, but you cannot make it so that iTunes can only be played on iPods?
I wonder what the RIAA's position is on this one?........... you see, if the iTunes can be played on numerous devices then one would expect them to sell more music (although iPod sales would go down?) and that should benefit the recording companies and possibly the artistes?
:confused:
