Re: how to poison your mind with antionline [and lavender usage]
Quote:
Originally posted by chemical
"HOW NOT TO GET FLAMMED" (THAT MEANS YOU ENISFAG) and **** like that, you know they are THE BIGGEST POSEURS HERE.
HOw not to get flamed, not flammed and yes as Remote_Access_ pointed out my name is Ennis.
Please if you wish to insult me use correct spelling that way you can look like you're making an intelligent argument and I may get offended.
Re: how to poison your mind with AO
...As you've all seen from the irc logs yesterday, this poor excuse for a human being has no more qualifications than that guy werking at Burger King makeing whoppers. He's been asked repeatedly to state his reasons for being so much superior that you and I and yet, he can't. I wonder why this is? I think I'll join acidphreak at McDonalds and grab a big mac and throw the wrapper on the floor so you can "feel" important... That dosen't necessarily mean that your are, but what ever. Ennis, I think someone forgot to look up the spelling for flameing while they were going through their thesarus. You can't get chemical to talk to you on irc because he can't type as fast as the rest of us and he has to have his trusty side kick, the thesarus, with him at all times. May be we'll get a reply when he learns a couple of new werds from his handy little thesarus...
Remote_Access_
back through the looking glass
so i'm waiting for my dev wkst to dump memory and reboot (been getting bsod alot lately on that guy), and i decide to use the time to continue reading/researching (as i often do)....and i come across this thread. considering the nature of it's dense but distant wounds, i thought i would query those that are still here and participated in this what their reaction would be had they read it today.
would you respond differently? if so, then how? my only curiosity is that there seems to be a change in mentality across the board as reflected in posting style, choice of wording, etc. also, the people/personalities that participated were, at best guess, fairly new to AO - and are now senior members. so it's interesting to see the changes made with that respect. it might even serve as a mental maturity map for those who are new here (or new anywhere) and, at the risk of exploiting one of the original points, want to be more like the senior members.
and i'll add my own comments having read this for the first time:
while the original post is rather derogatory and condemning; i do see some valid points. AO, like most boards and forums, has almost a bell-curve distribution of experience and insight amongst its members. from the 0-day "how do i get to dos?" to the veteran "eax holds the return". and includes the alternating ripples of experience between those who place their technological based background above their own ability to interrogate and make decisions and vice-versa. and for the most part the majority of the mass sits there in those ripples (i know i do).
i find the point made towards the motivational properties of the population of 'hackers' or people in general, with regard to learning, to be common among people who either a) were not alive during the psychodelic period(s) and/or live in a community that supported this type of lifestyle -or- b) are so close-minded to truely believe that their own underlying reasons for action are not only a commonality but a definition.
(note that the suggestion of drug-use above, is inferred, not implied)
but what is most interesting to me about this is the multiple levels of irony that took place throughout the whole thing. chemical's purpose was served - it received the reactions he/she was looking for. it got the support from some members, more than likely those that fell into the category of wanting recognition, who believed it was easier to turn face and be something that they probably weren't. it also got the negative feedback (some well composed, others not so well composed) that all ultimately helped to illustrate the original points that were made. and the original post didn't even escape the laws of damnation that it described. it was the epitomy of alterior motivation while promoting itself as the truth.