Printable View
he's actually part of the like core group of members... and it isn't a poor explanation, this is the way that they present the material... by making eveyone think they are stupid and yelling at them. it is more of a bad approach. the parts where they actually explain aren't terrible, they just don't do it enough nor in enough detail....
What I find most amusing is that he doesn't seem to understand the definition of a Day. A day (Earth-relative) is 24 hours long, or one FULL rotation of the planet. Therefore, there can only be one day occurring at any given point.
The guy is a mindless racist, who obviously doesn't understand how things work.
Here's an email I wrote him:
Quote:
Well, disproving the theory is very easy. A Day is not defined as from Midnight to 11:59.59 PM, it is defined as a full rotation of the earth. During one Day, each point on the surface of the earth enjoys 24 hours. They will not start at the same point during their day, as selecting a 'start point' to measure that rotation by can only be arbitrary, but they will guaranteedly encounter 24 hours. To say that there is some mystical time cube is merely a subjective or fictional addition to reality. In reality, given that the earth is 40075.1km around (based on the diameter of 12756.3km * pi -
from http://www.seds.org/nineplanets/nineplanets/earth.html) you could say there is actually a 40,075-sided time polygon, rather than a cube, if you decided to break it down by kilometre. Hey, why not do it by milimetre?
Then you have a 4007509836.7-sided 'time polygon' which you can base your theory on?
This theory of yours is untrue because the reference frame you are using is entirely arbitraty. The fact of the matter is that you have merely decided to pick a cube as your shape. You claim others do not understand, well, it's really you who doesn't understand.
Grab a clue.
Chris Shepherd
Ditto
lol! I just got a reply too! hahahah!
So, my reply:Quote:
Sorry, you are too stupid to comprehend the Time Cube.
Gene Ray
I promptly then added him to my ignore list, considering he would either A) not respond, or B) try and flame me or something. ;)Quote:
I am am I? Simply because I look up facts?
I see, you are not interested in discussing it or being proven wrong (which as the case is, just happened, and has likely happened a few hundred times before), or for that matter anything factual at all.
Well, have fun believing you are correct. You'd do well to make an effort to discuss the matter, but considering you feel yourself somehow superior because you lack a decent understanding of the physical universe, I see that further discourse (that means discussion, in case you don't understand) is rather pointless.
Chris Shepherd
/me sighs...
Some people...
Humm, he keeps talking about 4 corners. Doesn't a cube have 8 corners? A square has 4 corners. A cube has 6 squares, each with 4 corners, so maybe he should be using 24 corners... hummm, sounds like his kind of argument....
Yet he doesn't show that at 6 hours, we are no longer living in sunup, we are living in midday....Quote:
24 hours in midnight to midnight.
24 hours in sunup to sunup.
24 hours in midday to midday.
24 hours in sundown to sundown.
96 hours in a single Earth rotation.
No human or god occupies over 1 corner at same time during a 4-corner rotation.
3 days lost to academic stupidity.
I just find the arguement silly.
"There are four arbitratily defined points on the earth, and during a normal 'day' each one goes through a day. But there are four of them, so it must be 4-days that pass!!!!!!111"
Does he realize that these times in each location are CONCURRENT??... perhaps not, too many drugs scramble the brain.
No Terr, don't you get it!? Us 'mortals' are too stupid to understand!
LOL!
Does he mention that this time cube thing is Infinite? Does it carry on to other planets?
Here is my proof of him being wrong. He is basing his time cube and the four corners on the suns rises and falls.
1- when the sun rises.
2- when the sun is at midday
3- when the sun sets
4- when the sun is on the opposite side of the planet. (midnight)
Okay, in a billion years when the sun runs out of energy and begins to expand and swallow the earth into its mass, will the theory still hold?
Didn't think so.. someone can write him that.
/me is a genious...
Trust in me and my beliefe that Nerds being smart with no social life and geeks less smart but more social are mere steriotypes of common misconceptions of many geeks and nerds. I happen to be a nerd, but I do have a social life. I'm proud to be a nerd, and like I said: Nerds = Software. Geeks = Hardware. it's the only valid reasoning. but what happened to the other words, like dweeb. that is a very uncommon word indeed. but what does dweeb mean? perhaps a dweeb is a lesser mix of both a nerd and a geek. the foggy point at which a geek becomes a nerd.
Ubernerds have full domination over ubergeeks. let me explain my reasoning:
As new computer inthusiasts and hacker-wannabes start to learn about computers they are merely lame. they will eventually become adept in the software side of things and become somewhat of a nerd. but when you delv into the world of hardware AND software, you step foot into another world. but once you master both sides, you can truthfuly say you are a ubernerd. uberkeeks start from the hardware side, and trust me, hardware is a lot easier to learn about than software. software is more complex and very broad. thus the geek has more to learn, and the nerd is smarter. ubernerds overpower ubergeeks. and dweebs are just lame.
uh, i think im in the wrong forum :)