~*~*Are we ready for another CyberAttack?*~*~

Well if one is involved in their community real life then anything unsual is usually noticed. Point being one person can make a difference look what 8 people did 9/11 yep not good change things they did but not in ways they intended.

draziw > yeah, physically getting into a minuteman silo would be 99.9% impossible seeing as they are often designed to take a nuclear blast and maintain integrity! Even the old Nike missile silos had doors that would be very hard to breach w/o serious machinery

Blast from the Past. ;) Enjoy.

ps: thought I would bring this back since its seeming more likely every day.


To the only one who cares about my post:

[shadow]F*** OFF! ! ! ![/shadow]

You know who you are. And so do I. hahaha!

There's a big difference in defacing a website and retreaving "secret resources" (secret in a democracy sounds a bit weird to me, but that's not the point). The people who manage those .gov .mil etc. websites aren't all morons. Many scriptkiddies can deface websites by just watching bugtraq or some other exploit report site. Once they found a 0-day exploit for apache (for example, I don't have any idea what webservers run .gov pages), they can basicly deface a website, put their name somewere, upload an index file with higher priorities. Sometimes you can't just rewrite the current index file, because apache and the firewall isn't the only defence an unix or windows server has, so when you can change webpages, doesn't mean you can get root or even read any other files on the server... erm... So what I ment actually :s: If a brand new exploit is released (with proof of concept etc.) a scriptkiddie needs less time to use it on a .gov website then admin needs to find a patch or even make one him/herself. That way you can never have a 100% secure server and that's why the servering and other crap (I heard missiles somewere) shouldn't be one on system. I don't believe people would be that stupid... right ?