Depends on what kind of router you're talking about. An old P-90 can be had for about $25-50 these days, and a good iptables script can turn it into a router easily. If you're talking about a Cisco, however.... :eek:Quote:
Routers are the most expensive.
HTRegz is correct. Just to clear up any confusion, all 3 of these things are completely different beasts, and the distinction is not related to how many boxes they connect. Using a hub, when node1 sends information to node2, the hub broadcasts that information to *all* the nodes connected to that hub, so nodes 3, 4, 5, and 6 will receive the same information as node2. They simply ignore it because it isn't intended for them. This creates a lot of unnecessary traffic and packet "collisions" that can slow down the performance of the whole network. This is also how packet sniffers work. If node1 sends a private message to node2, node3 can be put into what's called promiscuous mode and told *not* to ignore the traffic meant for node2 and thereby intercept the communication. :lildevil:Quote:
we call a large box that connects up to 25 computers a switch: and a small one a router or hub.
A switch only transmits the information to the node that it was intended for and doesn't broadcast the traffic all over the network. This reduces chatter and speeds up network performance, as well as reducing the chance that someone might be listening with a packet sniffer somewhere on the subnet.
Hubs and switches connect computers on a single network or subnet, whereas routers connect different networks or subnets together (i.e., connecting a private LAN to the Internet or communicating between 2 subnets).
So for pinkpanther's problem, you need either a hub or a switch to connect all the machines on the home network together, and then you need a router to connect the whole thing to the Internet.
