Well that is interesting to find out. Nothjing like a little plagerism eh? I wish somebody had found that earlier before i stuck up for him. Damn. Anyway of taking back anti points?
Printable View
Well that is interesting to find out. Nothjing like a little plagerism eh? I wish somebody had found that earlier before i stuck up for him. Damn. Anyway of taking back anti points?
It would be cool if all these could be a single application.
Guys,
So... is there plagiarism or not?
I can't believe someone that commited plagiarism has extremely positive in his #1 post status.
Something's burning here...
DKRR
Not only is the list and the links plagiarized, but his rankings are stolen too. The Wilders.org list contains star rankings and ChrisWuk's 3/5, 4/5 rankings match the star rankings.
I am curious why the original post is still pegged on the positive side and the thread is ranked as extremely positive, yet ChrisWuk's profile still has only the one grey dot for AP's. Based on that it would seem the negatives and positives are balancing out and should be reflected both in how his original post and the thread as a whole are ranked.
It is a good list, but you should have cited the source or just linked to it instead of implying or claiming to have invested time and effort in acquiring this list of tools.Quote:
excuse me, i spent a long time getting each of these tools, trawling thru loads of web sites looking for the best tools and live links.
This thread is being close for now until I discuss this with other moderators as to whether to do a complete deletion. This is an obvious plagarism of the wilders.org website as referenced here with alterations to make it harder to find.
Might I suggest in the future that this kind of thing could easily be promoted by simply saying "Hey guys! I found this site that would be most excellent reference!" and then site the location? You'll earn far more respect that way than you will attempting to pass off info as your own.