Printable View
I think that in order to get a fully operational form of artificial intelligence we have to retrieve the chip from the model t101 in the factory where sarah conner crushed it.
Then we can work out its logic and reasoning and build super strong ento skeletons and cover them in biological material to make the perfect killing machine or AER.
So, Who's nicking down the factory to get the arm and the chip back then.
Nah, I nipped down there yesterday but they already threw it out. You gonna have to go dumpster diving again.
(You're really not helping, you realise this? :P)
LOL,
O.K. I will contribute something worth while.
Do a google on AI programming languages. you will find several languages dedicated to AI.
P.S also do a google on "weapons of mass destruction" and hit the i'm feeling lucky button. Its funny.
An AI program would not usual modular or object orientated languages but rather a complex system of neural nets and complex matrices in order to 'learn'. Nodes or synapses would have to be formed and linked and be able to stengthen or weaken the weight of pathways through experience. I do not think computers as they are designed today(digitally) are capable of reproducing the functions of an organic brain. They funtion on very different principles, ie analog and digital. Humans do not calculate things, they just DO them because they have learned through a vast amount of trial and error.Where our decisions are made from past experiences and constantly changing, a machine uses logic structures which do not change. Also text would have absoloutley no meaning to a machine as it is used solely for our benefit not the machine's, its all 1's and 0's to them. You must create a brain which can learn to crawl before it can walk, we aren't born reading and neither will a machine be. An AI would have to spend time as an infant unable to communicate just like us and learn first to organize the data recieved from its senses before it can begin to make use of that information. Most likely as silicon based technology becomes obsolete we will see an integration of existing technology with more biological based machines, and computers will become far more complicated and powerful as they are able to grow and adapt to their environment like organic lifeforms.
-Maestr0
Sorry, but i couldn't resist...
i found that in the TechHumor forum :DQuote:
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity.
A widely used language for artificial intelligence is LISP, which stands for List Processor. Programmers like it so much, because it can handle complex data structures so well.
You might want to visit this excellent site: http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~russell/ai.html
They have an upper year AI course at my university and it is taught using the Scheme dialect of LISP that peace_on_earth mentioned.
Check out more info on it here:Quote:
Scheme is a statically scoped and properly tail-recursive dialect of the Lisp programming language invented by Guy Lewis Steele Jr. and Gerald Jay Sussman. It was designed to have an exceptionally clear and simple semantics and few different ways to form expressions. A wide variety of programming paradigms, including imperative, functional, and message passing styles, find convenient expression in Scheme.
http://www.swiss.ai.mit.edu/projects/scheme/
do you people have any idea of "CYBORG" Project.
what is it all about?
Why it hasn`t been completed successfully, continual research is going on it since past decade?
Maestro, that's exactly what my proposed database structure should emulate. It's not going to create a genius, at least not with current processing power, but at least it'll be an interesting way of modelling the development... incidentally, there's been some huge advances on bio switches for processors.
AlcatraX, never heard of it... links? More info?
another subject you would need to take into consideration when writing a program for imitating human thinking is psychology. To an extent, it also is based on rules, just like language, these two areas are where I think one should focus. Because they are based on rules, they can concievably be imitated by computer programming.