So I didn't "quite get it" ? Now at least try to put some enrgy here and read the posts with less ubjected to anger etc, just because my point is different. I said VERY clearly in my first post I don't agree with terrorists. i also said VERY clearly altough I know other countries do the same and that ****, I was going to discuss the US here. Maybe it's unfair to put the US on it's own all the time, I don't care. I want this to be discussed because of all nations the US is a very important one and because they are they should at least behave in what they do. I'm not discussing the terrorists here. Now to make it a little easier for you I'll start this quoting thing again:
Quote:
These terrorists wanted to attack us because they hate us, because we are not forced to worship Allah or whoever else they worship. We have freedom to do what we want when we want. We have freedom to stand out in the middle of a street and say awful things about are President, yet if you go to their country they will shoot you down just because they don't like where you come from.
On one side you say you don't want to sitick the racust thing on it, but here you say something different. The misconception that this is a "Jihad". You say, cheyenne1212, they kill so many people to get people to believe in Allah ? Because that's what a Jihad is. It's in their sacred book to spread the religion as far as they can and if neccesary with the means of a war. This is not a "Jihad". The US is to far away for that. They just hate America and their way of free-market, dirty tricks we all seem to know off etc etc. The "terrorists" being muslim fundamentalists isn't the issue. That's the reason they have the lifestyle the have now and that's where they get their mental strength from. It's NOT the reason to attack the US. The issue about geting shot for yelling bad things about the president is not the issue because I was taking about the US. The US who, ON A SIDENOTE, arrested a german guy for comparing Bush with Hitler.
Quote:
I see two countries invaded by the US. The first was a PROVEN haven for terrorists (I'm pretty sure it wasn't a coincidence that Usama Bin Laden lived in Afghanistan) and was ruled by a repressive regime where the slightest infraction WOULD GET YOU SHOT OR HUNG. Women were not even allowed to go to school. How would the female members of your family feel if a bunch of religious fanatics took away their ability to get an education and seek gainful employment? How would YOU feel if you saw your mom forced to BEG FOR FOOD on the streets? If giving a group of people back the rights to education and self government is "ruining" a country, then I'm ready to ruin the world my friend.
"You" were fighting terrorists. The US should mind their own buisiness in other countries politics if they want to stay out of fire. By doing all kinds off stuff they get themselves into problems, now the US should also be able to handle critisism.
I made a note at the beginning, I wasn't even discussion terrorists nor the war on terrorism. The threads title is constitution. Whatever proof their was, you exterminated an entire nation. The very first intend of bombing Afghanistan is to *murdered* as many people as had died on 9/11. It was an action of revenge. They wanted to destroy the terrorist camps by more effective means, but they failed. That doesn't mather, the fact is they still ruined millions of peoples life. The US did.
Quote:
On to country number two...can anyone here spell OPPRESSIVE REGIME? It's a country where saying ONE BAD WORD against the leadership could get you and your family exterminated. A country where women could not walk down the street without fear because the head honcho's son had a reputation for grabbing women off the street and raping them if he found them the least bit attractive. These guys looked at torture the same way that the rest of the world looks at basketball or soccer....they did it just to get their kicks. So I guess if you are a sadist then hell yeah...we ruined that country too.
The opressive regime was, like I said in the first post, I nice side effect. The intentions of the war were to get those hidden weapons of mass-destruction who could be used against the US. Now many people died there, but no weapons and no Sadaam yet. That doesn't mather, the fact is they still ruined millions of peoples life. The US did.
Quote:
Yes, my government is FAR FROM PERFECT....but at least I can say that without fear of reprisals from death squads and other mercenary types. There is corruption here, but the people of the US have the ability to root such things out and remove them....something that every country in the world deserves to be able to do. After all...all men (and women) were created equal.
If you go on the racist thing again, why shouldn't the entire globe be allowed to be ruled by muslims ? Because you think this system is best because you grew up in it, you didn't live in the other culture so you can't judge as I can't judge the intelligence of americans.
Quote:
And neel, playing the race card was just plain wrong. We don't hate arabs nor do we hate muslims...we hate oppressive bullies and they come in all colors. If people don't quit playing the race card then racism will never go away...and we all have to start with ourselves when attempting to wipe out that particular blight from the earth.
I know it was wrong and I did it on purpose. Not to call you a racist, but many many people thing like this: muslim==terrorist. So this card is an issue and so I brought it up.
Quote:
I guess my "proactive point of view" is a wee bit too much for some of you people to handle. But tell me this...what are we to do when we see cruelty and injustice visited upon our fellow human beings....human beings who have had the power to control their own destinies stripped away from them? Turn a blind eye and thank God that it is happening to someone else? ANYTIME I see wrongs being done that cry out to be righted and something needs to be done I have to ask "If not me...who? If not now....when?"
I don't want to discuss those terms you all have like "proactive point of view" I learned in the previous thread wich was about these thing, you actually have a point. The point in this thread is the way you treat people after they are caught or treat a nation wich is "suspected" of "possibly" hosting "some" terrorists. The ignore human rights as much as the terrorists do if not more. This is a different thread and I didn't want to discuss this **** again. Please read the subject.
Quote:
So neel, HTRegz, and all the rest who don't quite "get it" let me say this....if I'm walking down a street and see you getting the crap kicked out of you by a bunch of hoodlums, I'm going to do something about it. Be it calling the police or jumping in and getting my own knuckles bloodied, I'm sticking up for the underdog. To be quite frank, if or when the day comes that one of you becomes the underdog, I seriously doubt that you'll bitch like you have here if I try to save your ass at the risk of my own...but then again you never know, some people just can't be satisfied.
People have a reason to "beat up" someone. You would not interfere if you could not win, because that would be plain stupid. You together with almost all people on earth are to "pussy" to come help me if I was beaten up by 10 people and you were on yer own. Only if you got some B12 bomber handy in yer pocket (so I'm comparing with the US now) you would interfere and you wouldn't interfere because you liked me, but just because I was loosing. Maybe I was the badguy trying to rape on of the gangs little daughter and they could stop me just in time.
=======
Part 2:
To jaguar291: you got the same thing alenb has.
So you got proof and so you picked the right country... Don't you see what you are saying here ? Besides I didn't see the prove of terrorist camps in Afghanistan (only some fague lowsy pictures, wich weren't worth ****), you ruined the ENTIRE country, not the terrorists.
Quote:
There's a time for diplomacy and there's a time for action... we did our jobs abiding to the Geneva Convention but when our soldiers are being pecked off 1-2 a day, it gets ridiculous.. we need to play on the same grounds as the enemy or those numbers will go up higher and higher....
Your soldiers getting killed has nothing to do with the treatment of prisoners of war. You got killed because the enemy was strong to, and your soldiers less strong then they appear to be in warmovies on television. The prinsoners didn't kill those soldiers and if they did, how can unarmed people be a threat to an army ? Sounds like the armies fault to me.
Much respect for all soldiers though, but that quote was just wrong.
Quote:
And how have we exactly taken away their appropriate rights? We've fed them, sheltered them, gave them the right to speak, and we're holding military tribunals (soon enough) to prove guilt or innocence.
They were caught and held without reason and some other things you knew if you read the articles. Also the US murdered nations with no good reason.
ok, because your post is so long and generally filled with the same **** I don't agree with I'll stop bitching at you because it's not going to help me prove my point anyway. Again, I'm discussing the US and I know 2000+ people got killed in the US, it's not the issue in this thread. Sniping is wrong, killing a million is wronger.
Quote:
To them it doesn't matter, they live in fear of us, we lead the world, and they find every execuse to make it sound like we are horrible people.. but yet they envy us.. they wish of living here and work their entire lives to come here one day...
And quit the ****ing patriotism fool. Don't hide about you "fellow" americans. Show some more self thought out things instead of quoting President speeches all over. Try to be objective for a change.
I know you're going to quote me on this because "you didn't quote president speeches" or something. Think again if yer going to post that.