Printable View
Well, the no-ap cosmos rule applies to not negging anyone for expressing their opinion. However, if you post crap then hunting season is open on that particular post. :pQuote:
Originally posted here by H0tH4cks0r
this lil weasel couldn't keep the no-ap cosmos rule .... are all republicans like this ?
btw clintonsuxtoo ...
BTW, if you moan about anti-points without good reason, you're likely to get negged even more.
I am ignorant here...........and most elsewhere also?
Can anyone point me to sites where "American Politics For Idiots" are explained?
We know that you have Republican and Democrat parties...but where do I get succinct information?
I know I could "google"....you do it...how many hits?
Help please...Merry Christmas and happy new year
Johnno
The reason I negged you hothacksor was not because of my political view, not because I disagree with you, but all of your posts have been BS posts, and it seems like all you doing is trying to cause trouble. Normally I never give out AP's in the cosmos forum, but this is a useless post. And thats why I negged you.
Oh and zato we are rebuilding things over there. I can let you call my friend whos an engineer in the army and let him tell you of all the stuff hes building over there for the civilian population.
As far as casualties of civilians and what not, When there is war, casualties happen. Its a fact of life. I'm not saying its good, but I'm saying that we've tried our best to stop casualties, but you can't stop all of them.
Now, I'm going to go play Call of Duty :D
Merry Christmas!
I could care less what the military is rebuilding over there. That is like saying ohh im sorry i chopped your arm off, heres a band-aid. The destruction they have caused cannot be overlooked just because they fix some things that they destroyed. We could have stopped american and iraqi casualties by listening to the rest of the sane world when it opposed going to iraq. War over there is unescessary and its costing money and lives. And your just saying "oh well, thats a part of life". Thats such BS. We can blab about this all day but does it really affect us that much? No. The people that are suffering are on the other side of the planet. You wouldnt defend this BS war if you lived in a city that was constantly under the threat of being bombed.Quote:
Originally posted here by cheyenne1212
The reason I negged you hothacksor was not because of my political view, not because I disagree with you, but all of your posts have been BS posts, and it seems like all you doing is trying to cause trouble. Normally I never give out AP's in the cosmos forum, but this is a useless post. And thats why I negged you.
Oh and zato we are rebuilding things over there. I can let you call my friend whos an engineer in the army and let him tell you of all the stuff hes building over there for the civilian population.
As far as casualties of civilians and what not, When there is war, casualties happen. Its a fact of life. I'm not saying its good, but I'm saying that we've tried our best to stop casualties, but you can't stop all of them.
Now, I'm going to go play Call of Duty :D
Merry Christmas!
So we should of just let saddam be and let him kept funding alqueda so that maybe they could do a bigger terrorist attack?
If I lived in Iraq I would support this war because I would know that it got rid of a dictator and will help to make Iraq a free country with a democracy.
Now whats so wrong with that?
Just one point. Invading Iraq in my opinion will cause more terrorism thatn it will stop.
Thats me for this argument.
well i couldn't care less of the ap's , its just most americans here are so full of themselves, of their politics, of their great army, of their great ignorance., and thats what bothers me.
The manor in which americans post here makes me puke, .... saddam we got him, yay , **** you all, you didn't had somthing to do there except the hijacking oil. Did you guys ever think what your last presidents actually did besides making war ? Did you guys only ever thought about the people you made homeless in irak, lets not even talk about the people losing their loved-ones there.
THERE WAS NEVER PROOF , the evidences were manipulated ...
There are indeed exceptions, but americans being cocky to the rest of the world make me puke.
You are the youngest people on earth, you owe your existence of anyone you attacked in your history ...
Yeah, so what? Bush is an idiot, bush is a hero yadda yadda yadda. Why don't you move to Belgium and have a Duvel?
Oh wait... you already live in Belgium. My bad.
There was about the same amount of physical evidence showing that Sadaam funded Al-quada as there was for him owning weapons of mass destruction. I don't think there ever was a serious risk of terrorist attack from Iraq - the reason I agreed with the war was because we've dealt with a ruthless dictator who tortured and murdered his own people.Quote:
Originally posted here by cheyenne1212
So we should of just let saddam be and let him kept funding alqueda so that maybe they could do a bigger terrorist attack?
Iraq was never a serious security risk to the UK or the US - Sadaam's missles would never have reached us and he wouldn't dare launch an actual invasion of either country because he knew full well that if his forces came with 100 miles of the UK the RAF would shoot them down.
Where is your 'respectable' news source that can prove saddam was funding al-queda?**IN NO WAY IS THE OCCUPATION OF IRAQ REVENGE FOR 911** Yes, Saddam is gone. It didnt require US occupation though. US occupation always leaves a trail of blood. Saddam could have been tried for war crimes without us invading and killing everyone. Im getting bored with this. I might as well be talking to a wall. LOL, what makes you think the government would put so much money towards making iraq a 'free country with a democracy'? How can you beleive that our government would do anything that involves spending billions of dollars without gaining anything for itself? Our government is not concerned with democracy in iraq. We have stomped out attempts at democracy from small nations all over the planet. What our government is concerned with is control. You make it sound like we go over there, kill all the bad guys, build a bunch of shiny new mcdonalds, find a bunch of new nice guys to run the country and then leave just like that? That is a fairy tale. The US will replace saddam but not saddams dictatorship. The last thing the government wants in Iraq is the population making decisions for itself, ie. democracy.Quote:
Originally posted here by cheyenne1212
So we should of just let saddam be and let him kept funding alqueda so that maybe they could do a bigger terrorist attack?
If I lived in Iraq I would support this war because I would know that it got rid of a dictator and will help to make Iraq a free country with a democracy.
Now whats so wrong with that?