Quote:
I mean, it's a server OS. What I'm running is not.
Not sure where you draw the line gore, there is no significant difference between kernels in workstation or desktop in Linux. Most open source distributions make NO distinction. I would say my Linux desktops are servers. Especially if I had mail and ftp turned on. In fact I could make the same comparison and call XP a server OS. It can do all the things 2003 (outside of MS proprietary file structure) can do with specific limitation imposed by MS for the sole reason of not letting it propagate as a server. Multiple desktops are cool but what's the purpose? You can only work one at a time. :D I have 10 desktops on my XP box all connected to different machines, now that has purpose!