Printable View
DUDE...Time to unplug man...Get some sun...Summer's almost over.Quote:
Originally posted by Louie
It means that if you have someone like me who only speaks English, would you speak in French to them.....
I will point out examples when I have time.
Si vous n'avez rien bon pour signaler, ne signalez pas.
Oh! I missed that one...Quote:
It means that if you have someone like me who only speaks English, would you speak in French to them.....
rien bon? Nothing good is translated rien DE ... and bien is the adverb you're looking for.Quote:
Si vous n'avez rien bon pour signaler, ne signalez pas.
Hell, and French only is my 3rd language!
Not bad though for someone who only speaks English!
And I'm looking forward to this examples.
BTW: if my English sucks, feel free to correct. At least I'm pretty sure my English even is better than some of the language produced here by 'some' native speakers. And I'm damn sure my English is better than their Dutch, French and German. And so is my Dutch, French and German.
Yours in languagespace
Negative
You didn't even offer louie any vasoline before inserting the flag pole.
Sorry about that, I like it rough :shootem: ...
Il y a des gens qui parlent beaucoup, mais disent rien du tout...
That means something like: There are people who talk a lot, but actually say nothing... (but in French it rhymes).
Na!
this thread is getting very far could we go back to the main purpose of this thread
to convert wondoze user to *nix
not to convert english speaking people to french voyeur
I guess we could go to the use of interpunction. Seems like a nice thread. Thx for the tip!Quote:
this thread is getting very far could we go back to the main purpose of this thread
I'm all ears. You're not making any contributions either, besides stating the obvious, are you?Quote:
to convert wondoze user to *nix
You bunch of ejeet AOLers (With the exception of Louie) don't know what the **** oyu talking about. Quit while you ahead or fjear....!
AOL is illegal in Belgium, cause they suck big time. And I damn know what I'm talking about. This thread has been going off-topic for a while (and I contributed to that, yes :cool: ), that's true. It's of course easy to say someone doesn't know what he's talking about. If someone just could make a statement in here, then I could react to that statement. Because now all there's left is to react to this bunch of ejeet (sic) AOLers (but I guess you count me in there, too). What's the topic about, anyway? Unix is safer than Windows? That indeed is a topic for ejeet (sic) AOLers.Quote:
You bunch of ejeet (sic) AOLers (With the exception of Louie) don't know what the **** oyu talking about. Quit while you ahead or fjear....!
Pwaring said:
>For one thing, the *nix versions of software such as Apache, >Perl etc. are far ahead of windows in terms of security (in fact >the Apache group won't even claim that the current win95/nt >version is remotely secure and don't recommend it for anything >more than personal use).
How is the software (?) Perl more secure on the GNU/linux platform(i assume you mean GNU/linux, and not UNIX, telling people to ditch windows and switch to a full blown UNIX system would be laughable), perl is a programming language and interpreter, its not a service in the ftp/http/netbios/telnet sense, obviously exploits have been found in CGI scripts but these are generally not platform specific and would exploitable running on IIS or apache - Perl is only as secure as you tell it be.
As for apache, what win95 version? Where do they make any claims that *ANY* version of apache is for personal use, define "personal use" - anything thats not a massive e-commerce site?
Certainly your idea is laudable, getting people to switch from windows to an open source os, but your methods are flawed.
I'm not defending NT/2000, I don't use it enough to make it a worthwhile discussion, but I'm standing by my feeling that my 98 box is a heck of a lot more secure than you seem to be insinuating, pwaring. I'm not saying *nix ISN'T secure, I'm just saying 98 is better than you are bashing it out to be.
Could you post some more specific assertions about your general idea? So far this is what I'm reading:
"Windows 9x is so insecure, I can hack it with my toenail through a process too long and involved to type here, because most of my post is about how *nix cures cancer and whitens my teeth while I sleep. And did I mention that Bill Gates is the Antichrist? He has horns. Look closely."
:D :rolleyes: