I think we should do the same (see ZombieMann77's post above) to the USA if they are ignorant enough to vote for BUSH again..
Printable View
I think we should do the same (see ZombieMann77's post above) to the USA if they are ignorant enough to vote for BUSH again..
My ignorance shines like a crazy diamond.
better get'em ready the_JinX!
Nah, I don't think America will stand for Bush for another 4 year's. Too many live's have been hurt through his already 4 year reign, and no one want's to see more. I think they'll vote against him (just who know's though if Kerry will be better).
are you refering to the 911 victims or the iraqi war?....I believe he will be voted again...Kerry cannot handle it, and someone needs to finish the job.
maybe we should refresh the country's memory with images of daniel perl's throat being cut while his head was removed and pics of the innocents blasted to pieces for wanting to work to rebuild iraq or the pieces of woman and children that happened to be around them at the time. Show some images of their own policemen blown to pieces for trying to restore order. Show the americans burned beyond recognition and hung from bridges. Show the enemy dancing in the streets and eating the liver, held high in blood drenched hands. Show this subhumanoid herd as the craven demons they really are.
poor bitches had to stand there naked and watch some kids act like ass-holes after committing these atrocities! boo ****en hoo. they should color themselves lucky they can still stand at all. had to wear a maxi-pad? stop your breaking my heart. let's keep in mind they wern't in prison for jay-walking.
I couldn't refer to the 9/11 victim's, lol. That wasn't Bush, but the Iraqi war was. Once we decided afganistan wasn't enough, from then on was it Bush. Kerry can't handle it? And how your basing this on what exactly? I'll have anyone BUT Bush right now, I'm willing to give this Kerry guy a chance because I doubt anyone could do a worse job then Bush.Quote:
Originally posted here by Cybr1d
are you refering to the 911 victims or the iraqi war?....I believe he will be voted again...Kerry cannot handle it, and someone needs to finish the job.
Yes, someone need's to finish the job. But that someone can't be a person who only add's to it (Iraqi Prisoner Scandel, Israel Situation, Bin Laden, "War" On All Terror-Associated Countries, etc). I can go on for awhile by the way about way's Bush add's to it :D
Got it :) thnx.Quote:
I couldn't refer to the 9/11 victim's, lol. That wasn't Bush, but the Iraqi war was.
I base that on the fact that Kerry has no concrete plan to fight Terrorism, and Hasn't said much about Iraq..except that he will not pull out the troops.Quote:
Kerry can't handle it? And how your basing this on what exactly
Not just an Orange Alert??? I wasn't aware that all Bush was doing is put an Orange Alert by the door of the whitehouse...I always thought more police were put in the streets, increased Airport security...and whatnot.Quote:
“When the threat of terrorism is increasing I’ll do more than simply issue an Orange Alert. As President, I’ll make sure that towns and cities don’t have to bear all the burden of increasing security – a price tag that can weigh in at several million dollars a day. I will create an ‘Orange Alert Fund’ that pays for police overtime and other security enhancements,” -- John Kerry
THe way I see this...we cannot prevent everything that might happen to our country,...but we can learn from what happened. 9-11 happened...and we learned...we increased security, and we beat the **** out of taliban. Some complain about the patriot act...I haven't suffered any freedom loss from it...I am still able to do what I did before.
Iraqi scandal wasn't caused by bush...but by the soldiers and the commanders. War on all Terror-Associated countries...HELL YEAH...if LaLaLand was harboring terrorists who want to kill you...would you go to war againts them if LALALAND willingly decides to keep them there?Quote:
Iraqi Prisoner Scandel, Israel Situation, Bin Laden, "War" On All Terror-Associated Countries, etc). I can go on for awhile by the way about way's Bush add's to it
I'm not sure what you're refering to with the Israel sittuation, I haven't followed up with the news for the past couple of days...working long hours. Shed some light please.
Ahh damn you Cybr1d. Now I gotta type and I'm lazy right now ;):
Because (and he said this) unlike Bush, Kerry want's to focus most of his attention on the issue's of the U.S, not other countries, etc. That's why he hasn't said much.Quote:
I base that on the fact that Kerry has no concrete plan to fight Terrorism, and Hasn't said much about Iraq..except that he will not pull out the troops.
Yes, it is a burden on individual cities. Your right, Bush did do that, but how much does it cost? I don't feel that much secure because Bush say's everything's safe and whatnot. ****, I feel safe because we know that 9/11 can happen and we know that next time won't happen. Why? Based on experience. Now we know America isn't the safest country and it CAN happen here (although it is still pretty safe).Quote:
"I’ll make sure that towns and cities don’t have to bear all the burden of increasing security" --John Kerry
Uhh, Bush is a commander. Commander-In-Chief to be exact. Bush's administration authorized and approved what happened in that scandel. So yes, Bush was apart of that. Some punishment they're getting too, no?Quote:
Iraqi scandal wasn't caused by bush...but by the soldiers and the commanders.
Ahh, I agree. However he's merely using 9.11 as a reason to INVADE these countries and "change their government". Simply because he feel's like it, not because 9.11. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 (other than they dislike Bush) and neither does Syria, etc.Quote:
War on all Terror-Associated countries...HELL YEAH...if LaLaLand was harboring terrorists who want to kill you...would you go to war againts them if LALALAND willingly decides to keep them there?
As for this I'm just saying overall. He has made no attempt to help that, he has really only made matter's worse (think and look back at the Hamas killings and the assassination's on their leader's). It was considered an issue that Hamas would start targetting the U.S for aiding Israel with those weapons and whatnot. Now you got a whole 'nother group of people against you and even more problem's.Quote:
I'm not sure what you're refering to with the Israel sittuation, I haven't followed up with the news for the past couple of days...working long hours. Shed some light please.
That's my take on Bush, if you disagree then sorry. I think Kerry should be president next. Anybody but Bush, really.
I understand that he plans to do that...but its all political BS because we already are inside the other countries...and wether Kerry likes it or not, if he is elected president, he has to pay just as much attention to the other countries as Bush is. We can't forget our soldiers. Look, the fact that we went to Iraq is also because the government they had Hated us with all their hearts...and given the opportunity, they would hit us without thinking twice about it. Bush had to do something. Kerry wants to cut money from the national defense, and the military to give to schools and cities. As noble as that might sound...we're not in a position where we can lose funding in our National Defense.Quote:
Because (and he said this) unlike Bush, Kerry want's to focus most of his attention on the issue's of the U.S, not other countries, etc. That's why he hasn't said much.
It has to be a burden in all cities...money doesn't grow on trees. It does cost a lot of money...but if it saves lives, Its well worth it. Bush says its safe...and its all part of his political BS, but....he's doing all he can. THe patriot act being one of those things. America is not safe, and it never was...no country in the world is safe. If someone is determined to kill people....they will find a way. If someone doesn't see that...then they're just blind. You just figured out that the world you live in is not safe?Quote:
Yes, it is a burden on individual cities. Your right, Bush did do that, but how much does it cost? I don't feel that much secure because Bush say's everything's safe and whatnot. ****, I feel safe because we know that 9/11 can happen and we know that next time won't happen. Why? Based on experience. Now we know America isn't the safest country and it CAN happen here (although it is still pretty safe).
I'm sorry but I think you have missunderstood whats going on. Bush might be the commander in chief, but he doesn't go around telling people to abuse prisoners. Bush had nothing to do with the prisoner scandal. The commanders I was refering to was the people in charge of the soldiers. The techniques used, have been there way before bush...but because its an election year, the Dems are going to do all they can to try to sack Bush. They are trying to get Rumsfeld out, and they'll bullshit all the way if they have to.Quote:
Uhh, Bush is a commander. Commander-In-Chief to be exact. Bush's administration authorized and approved what happened in that scandel. So yes, Bush was apart of that. Some punishment they're getting too, no?
C'mon, you know better than that. Just because he feels like it? You know exactly why we got rid of Saddam, so I'm not even going to retype that. 9-11 is not the excuse, its the lesson learned....that if we sit around doing nothing...we will get hit. People out there hate us for who we are...do you understand that?....they will kill us the first chance they get just because of who we are and what we believe in...they will kill us even if we don't do anything to them.Quote:
Ahh, I agree. However he's merely using 9.11 as a reason to INVADE these countries and "change their government". Simply because he feel's like it, not because 9.11. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 (other than they dislike Bush) and neither does Syria, etc.
Why would you blame one person for all the things that are going wrong in the world??? Do you see yourself being the person pointing fingers your whole life? America is the most generous country in the world, and it tries to help whenever it can. As we speak we are in the process of trying another peace talk with them. Correct me if i'm wrong, but haven't we been the middle person trying to get them to declare a truce or peace amongst each other several times?Quote:
As for this I'm just saying overall. He has made no attempt to help that, he has really only made matter's worse (think and look back at the Hamas killings and the assassination's on their leader's). It was considered an issue that Hamas would start targetting the U.S for aiding Israel with those weapons and whatnot. Now you got a whole 'nother group of people against you and even more problem's.