Are 48% Of AntiOnline Users Mentally Defective?

Quote:

---

Originally posted here by CXGJarrod
You have been watching Fox (American Celebrity News) News? Did you get any info Ennis? Or did you just get the latest scoop on Ben and JLo? Personally I think drunk Irishmen could do better news than Fox. :)

---

That bitch has been Married so many times she's got permanent rice marks on her face.

JP.... If you're so against people who are Christian, then why the **** do you care if you're allowed to Marry Brad in HOLY MATRIMONY ?

Anyway, Bush is the idiot son of an *******, and Kerry is a ****ing Hippy. The election, which I won't be taking part in for voting, reminds me of the AVP movie Alien VS Predator saying "No matter who wins, we lose". (TM) Bash is a good thing heh.

Republicans are *****s and Democrats are Jack Asses. Literally, the symbol is a Donkey. Democrats are asses. Vote Libertarian.

I'll start voting when either a Libertarian gets in, or when Jello Biafra runs for office.


War being good for the economy... Of course it is! It makes the great unwashed and mindless Sheep think they need to buy things to support the Country. you know if people weren't so ****ing cheap all the time, and actually bought things, the Economy would do better anyway.

Buy ****, pay the taxes, do your part so shut a politician the **** up.

Quote:

---

Originally posted here by AngelicKnight
So, you rather wait till he's "dictator of the world" before doing anything about it? Wouldn't we all speak German now if that was the way to think?

---

Don't get my hopes up Du Der Shwanz

Quote:

---

You may have me beat on box uptimes, but I got ya on politics. C'mon, you know you want to give in to my overwhelmingly powerful Republican powers...mwahahaha....;)

---

I kick your ass on both accounts.

Pffft "A country of sissies" We aren't now? I didn't see Bush over there fighting. He sat his ass down in the White house, tapped his wife a few times, and probably called Daddy up to gloat. And being a Country of sissies... Hmm, you mean like when we sent planes over to bomb the **** out of buildings from the air? Where are the balls in that? It's not like they fought, they flew from above and dropped bombs like bitches, killing innocent people. Who is really the terrorist here?

Quote:

---

The world doesn't hate America. A few powerful individuals hate the course of politics that directly affect them and they control your minds.

---

a) i dont hate USA. In fact im almost like it :)

b) you should got out of USA more frequently. most countries is thinking about USA is the big evil or not. When a country (Superpower) starts to invade other countries because..... they can... other ones start to think "what will happen if USA doesnt like my haircut? or they start to need my rain forest?" So, yes, USA is atracting angry nowadays.
Its not a matter if USA is right to invade Iraq or not:
its a matter if USA is WRONG no one can stop them! just that.

c) Who is controlling minds? USA or every other government in the world? ..... hum lets balance... The odds that your mind is controlled are better than everybody else in the world...


Funny. Thats remember me McCarthy' time when everybody that disagree from USA were considered "communist". Now its the same, except now they are "al-qaeda". Everybody that disagree from US foreign actions is considered "pro-terrorists".

he he

Quote:

---

you should got out of USA more frequently.

---

I have lived in over a dozen countries from 1986 until just recently. This year alone I passed our pearly gates many times. I say that the world doesn't hate America because I have been there, got the t-shirt loved every minute of it. In fact I am in culture shock among my own disenfranchised people. :)

We like you hair cut; you ****ing kill our center of finance and attempt to destroy our defense headquaterter, then a different perspective is in order. I say **** because people can't guage the magnitude of those events anymore because the influences censor the very essence of them. It's a secret you know, not to be told in public here for fear that the influence will vary.

USA doesn't control the world it's a big place. The leaders of world organizations are NOT American. If the USA is ever extremely wrong, her people will join you. For it is the faith in democracy that guides them, not the people in charge losing touch of her soul.

No one disagrees that Al-Quida is a threat, no country is immune. That is the difference between the cummunist scare and today. However, they have much more influence through technology than communist russia.

DemonicKn1ght: Shut the **** up.. 'Nuff said.

Quote:

---

North Korea is actively abusing nuclear treaties. So what?

---

Yup and Bush knows better than to try and start **** with them. They would give us a healthy run for our money. They arent Iraq.

Quote:

---

No, because it's an interesting discussion and we like to decide for ourselves what discussions we partake in

---

Exactly. And to TigerShark: If JP is trolling or whatever, let him.. doesn't matter. So far, he's only said the most ignorant and retarded things in this thread.

Quote:

---

North Korea will hear from us on way or the other...as soon as we're done with Iraq.

---

Doubtful and if it were to happen it wouldn't be under the Bush Administration. But again, doubtful. EXTREMELY.

Quote:

---

How is it not in this case? So you'd rather sit back and watch?

---

No.. but just because we CAN do it doesnt mean we SHOULD. That phrase goes two ways ya know. And that's how I feel about the U.S policing the world.

EDIT:

Quote:

---

Pffft "A country of sissies" We aren't now? I didn't see Bush over there fighting. He sat his ass down in the White house, tapped his wife a few times, and probably called Daddy up to gloat. And being a Country of sissies... Hmm, you mean like when we sent planes over to bomb the **** out of buildings from the air? Where are the balls in that? It's not like they fought, they flew from above and dropped bombs like bitches, killing innocent people. Who is really the terrorist here?

---

THANK YOU SO ****ING MUCH.. :D

Gore, let's not rub my face in that, as I don't stand a chance against you all Linuxed out over there! ;)

I think you mistake being a sissy with tactical smarts though. You really think Bush could go over there and fight? Ha! Sure, that'll go over great with the Secret Service. And before you start critisizing using bombers as a military strategy, you darn well better show what the superior tactical move should be and why you know it's the better way. If by ground or by air, we're going to inevitably hurt some innocents either way...it's a sad, horrible truth.

Quote:

---

Gore, let's not rub my face in that, as I don't stand a chance against you all Linuxed out over there!

---

Nor me.. :D

Quote:

---

If by ground or by air, we're going to inevitably hurt some innocents either way...it's a sad, horrible truth.

---

Yes, but by ground is alot less casualites and more of not being a sissy. I mean ****, atleast you can see your opponent. But I'm not that concerned about that. Again, we're fighting Iraq and ****ing Afganistan. Not Japan or North Korea.

Quote:

---

Yup and Bush knows better than to try and start **** with them. They would give us a healthy run for our money. They arent Iraq.

---

Again, they will hear from us one way or the other. Have it be with diplomacy or military.

Quote:

---

Doubtful and if it were to happen it wouldn't be under the Bush Administration. But again, doubtful. EXTREMELY.

---

You're EXTREMELY wrong!

Quote:

---

No.. but just because we CAN do it doesnt mean we SHOULD. That phrase goes two ways ya know. And that's how I feel about the U.S policing the world.

---

....SO....let me get this straight...we can Stop Saddam, and we CAN stop Taliban, but maybe we shouldnt? You ignore the fact that many other countries depend on the US to stay active across the globe....That includes Europe.

Quote:

---

Yes, but by ground is alot less casualites and more of not being a sissy. I mean ****, atleast you can see your opponent. But I'm not that concerned about that. Again, we're fighting Iraq and ****ing Afganistan. Not Japan or North Korea.

---

You mean a lot less civilian cassualties? No Not neccesarily. By ground you still use weapons such as Mortars and RPGs...which do not discriminate....By ground you also suffer a lot more losses amongs your troops.

Quote:

---

Again, they will hear from us one way or the other. Have it be with diplomacy or military.

---

Bullshit.

Quote:

---

You're EXTREMELY wrong!

---

Umm.. nope?

Quote:

---

....SO....let me get this straight...we can Stop Saddam, and we CAN stop Taliban, but maybe we shouldnt? You ignore the fact that many other countries depend on the US to stay active across the globe....That includes Europe.

---

And we depend on other countries as well. We can stop them, yes. But does it give us the right to because we want to? No.. That's my whole ****ing point.. Which you fail to realize, but hey..

Quote:

---

And we depend on other countries as well. We can stop them, yes. But does it give us the right to because we want to? No.. That's my whole ****ing point.. Which you fail to realize, but hey..

---

Spyder...we were ****ing attacked by taliban.....YES IT DOES GIVE US THE RIGHT TO **** EM UP!

Saddam was a ****ing threat....YES IT DOES GIVE US THE RIGHT TO **** HIM UP.

Its about ****ing time someone learns from history and all the ignorant liberals out there can do is bitch and moan..when THEY WOULD DO THE EXACT SAME ****ING **** SO SHUT THE **** UP WITH THE BITCHING!

**** this ****...i'm going to watch the Red Sox pound the Angels....


some people just dont ****ing understand what world we live in.

Spyder, go do your homework on North Korea....wtf...you really think we're just going to ignore them? Seriously wake up.

I pray to GOD that we do not elect a democrat or the country is ****ed.