Quote:
What then is fair compensation for assuming the strictures of unlimited liability? Insofar as military service is considered a "calling," part of the contribution made by members is in the form of selfless service - service for which remuneration is not expected. However, there must be limits. When Forces personnel were deployed to help with the "ice storm" they worked long hours and received $12.77 (taxable) in additional Field Operations Allowances; their entire additional daily entitlement for 12 to 18 hour days. Their civilian counterparts and the RCMP, on the other hand, were paid overtime for the extra hours worked. Military personnel were billeted in gymnasiums while civilian workers stayed in hotels.
The military is a way of life... you give your life if you join... I've always heard that... I don't think they should have even received the extra 12 bucks... If you're salaried you don't need to get OT at all... I don't get OT when I work 60 and 70 hour weeks... Lots of other people don't either... You do what is needed of you.... Who cares if their civilian counterparts got extra... They could refuse the OT.. and walk away (some with the RCMP)... their companies decided that they were worth paying to have there... Civilian Workers again.. their companies put them up in Hotels... there's nothing wrong with being billeted in a gym... it does the trick... Again the military is supposed to be a way of life.... This whole paper sounds like a fight for more funding for the military and the whining of soldiers.. Complaining about public opinion (public opinion is that way for a reason).. complaining about pay... it's awful...