Shoplifting Vs. Downloading
Now this got me thinking. Now i'm not a very big cough downloader cough cough. Sorry but ya you know when you just can't get a song out of your head. Anyways for anyone who might think otherwise. Take a look at this.
Quote:
Shoplifting is safer than downloading
Karl Wagenfuehr, who is not a lawyer, researched the penalties for shoplifting a DVD as compared to the penalties for downloading one. His conclusion:
Stealing:
Absolute Minimum $0 No Jail
Absolute Maximum $100,000 1 Year Jail
Example: Winona Ryder*:
$2,700 fine
$6,355 restitution
$1,000 court cost
3 years probation
Infringing:
Absolute Minimum $4,400
Absolute Maximum $3,400,000 1 year jail lawyer fees and costs
Example
An Average RIAA settlement**:
$14,875
Legal punishment is a kind of social policy. When our laws have terrible punishments for some action, we're saying, "This is very bad, and those who do it are just as bad." The worse the punishment, the worse the crime. The punishment should suit the crime -- if we instituted the death-penalty for public spitting, and didn't ratchet up murder to at least the same penalty, it would be as though we were saying, as a society, "Murder is trivial when compared to gobbing on the sidewalk." One has to wonder, then, what kind of crazy society we live in given the relative penalties for infringing a copyright using a computer as compared to stealing an object from a store? Why kind of fool lawmaker lets himself get talked into making this social policy? Link
Oh and just for my own sake I'm not telling anyone to go out and shoplift.