Re: Re: Re: RedHat 9 Problem
Quote:
Originally posted here by gore
Um, he said THE MONITOR TURNS OFF AND WON'T TURN ON. It's his X configuration. when you install Redhat there isn't even a screen saver set by default.
Well thats what appeared to be happening with mine and I would have to turn the machine back off and then on again to get it to work. I called redhat and thats what they told me to do and I ended up with power management disabled and still set it to monitor the irq and now it doesn't turn off.
Several ppl told me all I had to do was enable the screen saver and the command to shut the screen down would never arise...
I know there is no screen saver by default thats why the screen blanks, the bios uses several methods of blanking the screen. I just did what the guy told me to do and my box stays lit.
I have screen savers that freeze the machine sometimes but other than that my screen stays on and doesn't turn itself off.
Re: Re: Re: RedHat 9 Problem
Quote:
Originally posted here by gore
Um, he said THE MONITOR TURNS OFF AND WON'T TURN ON. It's his X configuration. when you install Redhat there isn't even a screen saver set by default, but that doesn't matter anyway. The monitor is shutting down just like mine did one of the first times I installed Linux.
Fixing the X configuration solves this. Which is why I said he should get the manual for the monitor and see what settings are safe.
Which reminds me; If you can't find the manual for the monitor, or for some reason don't have it, look it up online and find the settings it can handle.
Ahh yes good point I did have that happen once when I hooked a test monitor up that was not able to do 1280x1024...
Re: Re: Re: Re: RedHat 9 Problem
Quote:
Originally posted here by TheGh0st
I have screen savers that freeze the machine sometimes but other than that my screen stays on and doesn't turn itself off.
I'v noticed with Redhat that if you use a very graphical screen saver, like the end game chess screen saver for example, that it seems to skip, even after upgrading Nvidia drivers. Never had this problem on any other distro though. I think it's just because redhat sucks.
EDIT:
For your post below:
It seems to be working fine, I just gave you greenies and it worked out fine.
Also, if you have an extra $80, I'd recommend buying SuSE 8.2 or 9.0 Professional. It's ALOT better than redhat. I'v turned quite a few redhat users on to SuSE and also some Linux newbies onto it.
http://www.suse.com
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RedHat 9 Problem
Quote:
Originally posted here by gore
I'v noticed with Redhat that if you use a very graphical screen saver, like the end game chess screen saver for example, that it seems to skip, even after upgrading Nvidia drivers. Never had this problem on any other distro though. I think it's just because redhat sucks.
Well the only release that isn't loaded down with garbage and usless **** is 7.2 lol
It is stable I will give them that, but it is only stable if you know what all 10 million usless garbage addons can be removed and deleted... my core is custom :) I guess a lot of it would be like using a ship anchor for a row boat hehe
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RedHat 9 Problem
Quote:
Originally posted here by TheGh0st
Well the only release that isn't loaded down with garbage and usless **** is 7.2 lol
It is stable I will give them that, but it is only stable if you know what all 10 million usless garbage addons can be removed and deleted... my core is custom :) I guess a lot of it would be like using a ship anchor for a row boat hehe
Heh, that and RHN is complete ****. Having to sign up for an account just to update...Yuck. I use SuSE, Slackware, Debian, Libranet, Mandrake, and BSD. Redhat is the only one that makes you sign up for an account.
Even Windows doesn't make you do that! Heh, lol.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RedHat 9 Problem
Quote:
Originally posted here by gore
I'v noticed with Redhat that if you use a very graphical screen saver, like the end game chess screen saver for example, that it seems to skip, even after upgrading Nvidia drivers. Never had this problem on any other distro though. I think it's just because redhat sucks.
EDIT:
For your post below:
It seems to be working fine, I just gave you greenies and it worked out fine.
Also, if you have an extra $80, I'd recommend buying SuSE 8.2 or 9.0 Professional. It's ALOT better than redhat. I'v turned quite a few redhat users on to SuSE and also some Linux newbies onto it.
http://www.suse.com
I will give it a whirl I will just build another box here in my office... I use redhat 7.2 pon all my client machines but have a 9 box I was playing with... core disection weeeee If you say Suse is good I will do her and see how things turn out.
If I get stuck anywhere I will come to you fer help is that ok lol
I gave ya greenies and werked right after my post :)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RedHat 9 Problem
Quote:
Originally posted here by gore
Heh, that and RHN is complete ****. Having to sign up for an account just to update...Yuck. I use SuSE, Slackware, Debian, Libranet, Mandrake, and BSD. Redhat is the only one that makes you sign up for an account.
Even Windows doesn't make you do that! Heh, lol.
THats not all that sux about RHN I bought that 9 and then called them for support just to see what would happen and asked them some trivial dumb **** and the person told me that...
We are sorry sir you will have to buy an extended support package to have that question answered. I paid 145 dollars for something I could download... and then they did not even want to support their product without 1st sticking it in me another 3 inches.
I told the guy on the phone I was floored and that whoever made that choice was sick and needed help...
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RedHat 9 Problem
Quote:
Originally posted here by TheGh0st
THats not all that sux about RHN I bought that 9 and then called them for support just to see what would happen and asked them some trivial dumb **** and the person told me that...
We are sorry sir you will have to buy an extended support package to have that question answered. I paid 145 dollars for something I could download... and then they did not even want to support their product without 1st sticking it in me another 3 inches.
I told the guy on the phone I was floored and that whoever made that choice was sick and needed help...
Should have told him "Ugh, fine, I'll go buy SuSE".
They are competitors and the whole one time I actually contacted SuSE I got an e-mail the next day with my answer.
I'v never had a real problem with SuSE so I e-mailed there staff to ask how to pronounce it. I got the reply the next day (A few hours later) saying how to pronounce it. They were also very nice.