Printable View
So I was surfing online for wireless security cameras for my new house and I came across a sony video cam that with the proper filter lenses, you can have xray vision, enough to see through peoples clothing. Does anyone know if this is true? A google search for ADXIR gives links of companies selling the lenses, but they all point to the same site...
It is possible with specific older-type models of sony video cameras to do x-ray shots through certain types of clothing (tight fitting, dark colors tend to work best amazingly enough) - the filter is an IR filter from what I've read, but I'm quite unsure on the specific camera settings - for more info on X-ray voyeurism, I suggest you contact a voyeur site specializing in x-ray photography.
The source I got this limited information from was
www.voyeurweb.com
On a different note in this thread - do you truly think this is the place to ask about Pr0n technology?
First off, never assume, it makes an ass out of you and me...secondly....as for my question, this was more of a concern of me, my wife, or my children being photographed unknowingly...so please stop making a pompous ass out of yourself. After doing further research, this technology is actually used for fire fighting. Fire fighters are able to see through smoke etc. to find burning victims....
While I was working for a company which made various circuit boards, I came across a particular Circuit that was going to be used by firefighters to "see through" fire and walls...probably an infrared device...
Thats pretty cool Cybr1d. Id like to figure out the inner workings of circuit boards etc. one day...seems like the days go by faster and faster.
That's what this site is all about.Quote:
First off, never assume, it makes an ass out of you and me...
This site is about assumptions? Thats pretty crappy then...and news to me...
The response by Ice was 'supposed' to be an attempt at humour .................
Check the date.................
As for the idea of XRay specs - it was all fun in the 60's, and an obvious hoax.
Cameras which sell them selves as 'XRay' today are setting themselves up for the double entendre big time.
IF they have a real capability, then they should re-invent themselves along the lines of a more mature audience.
If not :
then they should stick to the comics.
[off topic]
answers that pi55 off people really get to me.
there is no real reason for them.
learn to keep your responses in check.......... This is cyberspace for F**ks sake.........
TDTN ...............[work it out]
:drink: LOTS OF
Enough :
Merry F**kng Xmas........
[edit]
IR wouldn't be the first choice in a fire zone, but it is used in conjunction with other wavelengths to build up a 'composite' picture.Quote:
I came across a particular Circuit that was going to be used by firefighters to "see through" fire and walls...probably an infrared device...
fire = F**KING BIG IR signatures.............
I guess I have no sense of humor then...darn.....
cough immaturity cough
This is an interesting subject..
As xrays and InfraRed are different areas of the radio spectrum there seem to an impressive array of technology arriving for the xray end over recent years..
to see where the 2 fit check here: http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/sc...mspectrum.html
but fitting into the pseudo Xray class have a look for the explaination here: DO READ These Before replying on my comments:
http://coolcosmos.ipac.caltech.edu/i...ackground.html
http://cc.ysu.edu/physics-astro/starlady/sept82002.html
There are also a range of sensors , like CCDs that are sensitive in the Xray band.. most of these are being used in medical and astronomical applications..
But as for the subject.. most of what is being discussed is InfraRed Not X-Ray ..
that is correct.. except these cameras that the fire fighters are being used for 2 purposed 1st being for life saving then fire location.. that are used in SMOKE zones..ie when all that is there to see is smoke....Quote:
IR wouldn't be the first choice in a fire zone,
Still true: but IR still has issues when the ambient temp is higher than the average bodyQuote:
that is correct.. except these cameras that the fire fighters are being used for 2 purposed 1st being for life saving then fire location.. that are used in SMOKE zones..ie when all that is there to see is smoke....Quote:
IR wouldn't be the first choice in a fire zone,
IR is the range of choice, it's just not the only wave length out there to have any use.Quote:
The normal core body temperature of a healthy, resting adult human being is stated to be at 98.6 degrees fahrenheit or 37.0 degrees celsius. Though the body temperature measured on an individual can vary, a healthy human body can maintain a fairly consistent body temperature that is around the mark of 37.0 degrees celsius.
[edit]
to the topic :
If the price is within budget, and the name is a known and 'trusted' brand, then buy it :
if the capability for seeing through clothes is available, set a feed up here :D
Ifra red is not just one wavelength.. it is a range of frequencies.. infact broader than visable light..
If you had visited the second link I provided your would see part of what I was discussing..
as for firefighters.. the cameras use a mixture of optical and electronic filtering to do their job
just do a bit of reaserch on Microbolometer cameras
Wildred old chap...............
I can see a small problem, perhaps?
"X-Rays"
Uranium 235, Strontium 90 , Plutonium............
"Homeland Security Act"
?????????????????????????
I believe that the whole concept would depend upon the possession of illegal substances.
It was merely something that I saw on Good Day America as well as something that was easily Google-able....Its not really an X-Ray as we know X-rays....like going to the dentist and checking for cavaties..its not like that...
From one article online, they say that you can actually see through clothing...which concerns me more than anything since I live in FL and visit the beaches frequently.
The question I asked, mistakingly, was whether or not the claims that many online sites have are true and whether or not this technology truly does exist...
It went from me being a voyeur, to firefighters, to illegal possession of substances...phew!
I wouldn't have asked this question if I knew it what would have transpired....oh well...
Hey Wildred.......chill out old chap, huh?
You asked a good question, but got a load of different ideas?
This is a "security site" so I took your question to be a security related one......
X-Rays are used in luggage screening, medical stuff and whatever.
Because you need a source,... you need to have the stuff to emit it...............now those are "illegal substances" as I chose to define them.
Both our countries have some fine young men away from home this Christmas on account of "illegal substances"?
;)
Agreed....I understand your description of Xrays..and agree that real Xrays do contain that...the whole Xray term (the way I was using it) was that you can see through things...I dont know if you recall, but way back when they used to sell Xray glasses...they didnt work...but were cool to the youngsters...they still used the term Xray even though they werent really anything Xray like about them. The idea that I was describing was having a camera act LIKE an Xray does...where you can see through things...in this case clothing..which really wouldnt be cool...
Ill stop replying to this post now, since its really just beating a dead horse. Bah humbug.