Buying a processor

So I'm sure that buying a processor has to be more complex then socket type and operating frequency, I just don't know what so my question is, what do you look for when looking for the best processor? Because I have found to AMD processors, that have almost the same operating frequencies, but their prices are COMPLETLY different:

A processor my friend is going to buy: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819103608

The processor I'm going to buy: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819103535

FX60 is the best thing on the market, It's built amazingly to make it the best thing ever. Definitly not a good price/performance ratio. Operating freq. and cache sizes are the main differences between yours and his. The reason there is such a big price difference with such a small speed difference is because this is what happens for top end stuff. To get a little bit better it costs a lot more, so for most people, it's not worth it. Go for the one you're looking at unless you just really want bragging rights.

Price and what MoBo I have is what decides it for me.

Which reference to the CPU your friend is buying - it is a dual core CPU - hence the $1000 price tag! Yours is not, hence the $160 price tag!!

They may look similar at first glance but they are two totally different CPU's!

Yours:
AMD Athlon 64 3200+ / 2 GHz processor
Processor Type AMD Athlon 64 - 64-bit
Processor Socket Socket 939
Performance Index 3200+
Clock Speed 2 GHz
Cache Memory L2 512 KB
Compatible Slots 1 x processor - Socket 939


Your friends:
Product Description AMD Athlon 64 FX 60 2.6 GHz processor
Processor Type AMD Athlon 64 FX 60 Dual-Core - 64-bit
Processor Socket Socket 939
Clock Speed 2.6 GHz
Cache Memory L2 2 MB
Compatible Slots 1 x processor - Socket 939

Your friends has 2Mb L2 cache 4x what yours has - 2GHz vs 2.6 GHz.

In a nut shell - the FX60 has two full 2.6GHz cores each with 1MB L2 cache. Each core also has 64K of L1 instruction cache and 64K of L1 data cache.
At 2.6GHz per core, the FX60 is essentially two FX55s sat side by side on the same package

Dual core is the way ahead - if ya can afford it!!

Oh what's the difference between dual core and the one I chose? I'm trying to get the best processor I can get withing my budget (> $200 for processor), i'm tired of a processor who's speed is measured in MHz

Dual core is basically two procesors on one chip. You definitly made a good choice for your price range. Unless you're gaming or doing some huge math calculations (say, prime factorization upwards of 10^15 digits) You won't notice a major difference between those two processors.

Oh good thats my main concern :) But i want a pretty fast comp since i'm an all around user, i do a lil bit of everything..also, is the socket of any importance? if so, is socket 939 a good choice?

Quote:

---

In a nut shell - the FX60 has two full 2.6GHz cores each with 1MB L2 cache. Each core also has 64K of L1 instruction cache and 64K of L1 data cache.
At 2.6GHz per core, the FX60 is essentially two FX55s sat side by side on the same package

---

Sorry I added this later as an edit!

Yes its a great choice - the cpu you want is perfect for a home PC!

k thanks a million :D

Your very welcome! :D

Now you just have to choose a good mobo, which is definitly harder than the good processor part.

Well how does this mobo look?
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813131569

Looks good. You might want to get something with SATA II though, since it's taking over harddrives at the moment. Other than that its' great.

What do you mean by "its taking over your harddrives at the moment"?

SATA II drives are getting more and more popular, and they are faster. they are the new standard basically.

Thats an awesome MoBo - its known as the "overclockers board" as it has soooo many unristricted settings that you can overclock!
I have one in one of my boxes - never had a problem with it - well i did with the first one.....but that was an overclocking issue ;) .


A good choice mate!

Oh, well I'm quite satisfied with what I've gotten so far in terms of searching for the mobo :D Much cheaper :p

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813123258
how's that one? (Of course I'd have to make sure it's compatible with all the other stuff on my inventory)

EDIT: lol Nokia thanks :D but I'm not really planning on overclocking, don't you need really good cooling for that? I get careless on airflow sometimes

I'd go with the ASUS over the epox... 4 compared to 6 usbs, and ASUS is a better brand.

hehe I kinda figured that because of the prices :p I wanted to get a DFI LanParty (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813136151) but too expensive for my liking, pretty good for cable management though

but which mobos do you reccommend?

The LanParty's are amazing. I have one, and have friends who have had the older generations of them. Overall, they are really good, hard to go wrong with.

I haven't worked with anything less than a Lan Party lately, as most of my friends have more money than me, and buy the best of the best.

yeh but I heard one of the RAID drivers are pretty buggy, my brother had to format about 3 different time when using that driver, he had to switch it..

I recently had 2 almost identical machines..side by side...one with IDE harddrive ..one with SATA, both with same video, RAM, MO, CPU and OS.

There was a noticable difference in response with the SATA drive.......definately the way to go

MHO as always

MLF

Yeah im definately going for SATA, seems to make more sense to me, bigger cable, more ground to cover (IDE), smaller cable, less ground to cover (SATA) :-p although I know that isn't how it works it just makes sense :d

Quote:

---

although I know that isn't how it works it just makes sense :d

---

Makes sense too me :D


MLF

Quote:

---

Originally posted here by Raion
yeh but I heard one of the RAID drivers are pretty buggy, my brother had to format about 3 different time when using that driver, he had to switch it..

---

If you're not using raid you won't have a problem though ;)