Steve Balmer, CEO of Microsoft, recently referred to Linux as a cancer.
This is incorrect - Linux was released on August 25th, 1991, and is therefore a virgo.
Yours in constellation space
Negative
Printable View
Steve Balmer, CEO of Microsoft, recently referred to Linux as a cancer.
This is incorrect - Linux was released on August 25th, 1991, and is therefore a virgo.
Yours in constellation space
Negative
I think you have a lil too much time on your hands Negative, but it makes for some enjoyful readings :D
I'm having two weeks off.Quote:
I think you have a lil too much time on your hands Negative
Francis Bacon was found guilty of corruptly having accepted money in 1621. That was 24 years after having finished his Meditationes Sacrae. He should have known better :pQuote:
Knowledge is power - Francis Bacon
LoL.
LoL.
LoL.
erm.... oh yes that was funny. LoL
LoL
LoL
It brought a tear to my eye.
LoL.:D :D
:D
:D
:D
:D
Secondly I'd like to kill anyone who puts linux down.
:D
Actually, X, Y, and Z, would be 60° only if X=Y=Z.Quote:
__________________
Consequential Equations
--------------------------------
If X , Y , Z are = angles of a triangle ;
then X , Y , Z = 60*
If God was a programmer;
then he would be using a Linux box.
The only rule all-the-time-rule-for-a-triangle would be that (internal angles) X+Y+Z=180.
If God was a programmer, he would, and presumably does use, Universe++, which is only compilable onto a system running the SpaceTime Infinity processor, which only runs RealityOS.
Hey Terr, you know Mr. Escher ?Quote:
Consequential Equations
--------------------------------
If X , Y , Z are = angles of a triangle ;
then X , Y , Z = 60*
If God was a programmer;
then he would be using a Linux box.
And if God is a programmer, he sure forgot to debug his stuff.
Komodo? Hmm.... I know a komodo....
Yeah, me too. Peep this ****!
I am already well-aware of the tricks that have been played by the brilliant Mr. Escher...
But I would point out that they violate no law, since they are 2-dimensional objects which merely trick us into thinking they are a 2-d representation of a perspective of a 3d object.
And yes, I know what a Komodo Dragon is... but how did that get into the discussion?
Ah, I just noticed something...
I think I see the logic, but the phrasing is VERY misleading.Quote:
If X , Y , Z are = angles of a triangle ;
then X , Y , Z = 60*
"If X,Y,Z are (equal to EACH OTHER and are) angles of a triangle"
is not the same as
"If X,Y,Z (represent, symbolize, are equal to) angles of a triangle."
Actually there are triangles that can have less that 180* or more than 180* they were developed by gauss and some other guy independantly, I can't remember the second guy. imagine a *striaght* line on the surface of the earth is actually quite curved in 3d space, thus a *straight* triangle in 2d space taken from a 3d impose of a triangle would be greater than 2pi radians. one on the inside of a "saddle" would be less than one.Quote:
Originally posted by Terr
Actually, X, Y, and Z, would be 60° only if X=Y=Z.
The only rule all-the-time-rule-for-a-triangle would be that (internal angles) X+Y+Z=180.
If God was a programmer, he would, and presumably does use, Universe++, which is only compilable onto a system running the SpaceTime Infinity processor, which only runs RealityOS.
Gotta love geometry don't ya?