Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 38 of 38

Thread: What do you think about paying to hackers for destroying porno-sites?

  1. #31
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    681
    bin laden is a terrorist.... he did kill people.... but look at it from the otherside of the ball.... to him, we are the terrorists. he believes that we are wrong just as we believe he is wrong. no, i don't agree with what he did, but that doesn't make me any more right then him. the japanese hate us for killing hundreds of thousands in hiroshima. who was right? we were at war with them... well bin laden declared war on the USA. America chose not to recognize his declaration of war. who is right? well i think it depends on whose side you are standing on.

  2. #32
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Yes
    Posts
    4,424
    Originally posted by Dumbdawg
    just type it into your browser, MAN O MAN THE HORRORS!! this is not how i would want to spend my time but apparantly they think a lil differently on the other side of the planet. but go ahead do a search on "LOLLITA" i can't remember who it is that has it legal, and i don't want to just guess, and I aint goin back there just to research a post.
    Well Dumbdawg, call me crazy, call me a pervert, whatever, but I own a copy of Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov (Russian, btw, and Russia was not part of Europe back in 1955). And yes, the book is about paedophilia, but it doesn't encourage it as you seem to believe:
    Lolita, Vladimir Nabokov, 1955
    "There is nothing more atrociously cruel than an adored child...".
    BTW: CNN did an excellent In-Depth Search Special on Nabokov, and the actress playing Lolita in the last (American!) Lolita-production is Dominique Swain (Indeed, American). She was 17.

    Paedophilia is sick, and there simply aren't any countries that legalize it.

    but go ahead do a search on "LOLLITA"
    And...?
    Do the words 'All persons depicted herein were over the age of 18 years at the time they were photographed or filmed.
    All pictures on this site are in compliance with the 18 USC 2257 US Federal Law' mean anything to you? And yes, everything you'll find if you 'type it into your browser' has a disclaimer like that...

    And in every country there are perverts, even in Canada...
    And in every country there are ignorant dumb****s, even in Canada...

    Originally posted by Pwaring
    (...) even better killed in action by the US forces.
    Great, another martyr

  3. #33
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    1

    Lightbulb

    i have an idea, y don't we all leve the webmasters alone and tell our children not 2 go 2 those sites! u peolple are trying 2 blame others 4 you're falure 2 teach your kids
    ~Aw

  4. #34
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    114

    naked geeky girls

    even geeky girls get naked

    http://guests.nakkidnerds.com/

    hack this site and you might get a taste of your own medicine :]

  5. #35
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    232

    Pedophilia

    Pedophilia, or the act or liking of having sex as an adult with a person under the age of 18, was, in fact legal in Japan up until a year ago, when the U.S came in and put a stop to it (I find it to be yet another example of how the God-fearing, bible thumping *******s of America have meddled in foreign affairs)... I am prety sure it is STILL legal in the former Soviet Union, as is pointed out in the site http://www.russian-babies.com, which is, if nothing else, a pre-teen porn site of disgusting magnitude.

    I do not condone the act of pedophilia.
    Welcome to Hell , where we have served more than all of the fast food chains put together! And the number grows everyday! Stay tuned!

  6. #36
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    752
    Originally posted by Auu
    i have an idea, y don't we all leve the webmasters alone and tell our children not 2 go 2 those sites! u peolple are trying 2 blame others 4 you're falure 2 teach your kids
    While I agree with the general idea of what you're saying, I still think some of your idea is flawed. First off, not all kids can be controlled. There are little spawns of Satan out there that will not listen to authority figures no matter what you do. Until they can be thrown in prison, we have to deal with them and keep trying to civilize them no matter how futile the effort may be. Do I think pornography fuels their destructive behavior? Of course not. I believe it's more of a symptom of destructive behavior, not the cause (no, that does not mean that all children who visit adult sites are destructive). But it IS illegal for children to go to those sites, and there has to be a way of stopping them if they won't listen to the rules. That's where our good friend, the web filter comes in. Otherwise, if he/she gets caught on an illegal site, such as a child porn site (and kids are likely to go to those), their parents could get in big trouble, simply because their kid couldn't be controlled.

    I agree that it's mostly people blaming others, as people tend to put the blame on other people out of both laziness and denial. Those in dysfunctional families tend to do it mostly out of laziness, as those with uncontrollable kids tend to do it mostly out of denial, and maybe desperation. And who is the handiest person to push the blame onto? The webmaster! "If you hadn't put that site out there, my kid wouldn't have been tempted to go there!" But of course, they completely forget that the child went there by choice. If your kid steals a candy bar from the local store, should it be the store's fault for stocking the candy bar and "tempting" them with it? Of course not. That would be ridiculous. Porn sites aren't widely advertised on the internet, same as Hershey bars aren't widely advertised at the store. Therefore, there is no tempting or provoking involved.

    Those who want to hack porn sites are usually the bible-slamming, righteous wannabe, in-your-face, feel-good Christian psychopaths. They want to "save your soul", and don't care who you are or what your beliefs are. They just want to push their beliefs on you to "save your soul", and "save you from eternal damnation". But if nudity is such a horrible, despicable sin, why are people born naked? Why aren't they born with those little leaves covering their genitals like in those Adam and Eve pictures? They think sex is such an evil, taboo thing, but forget that they wouldn't even exist without it. They go out and rally against what is responsible for their very existence. Maybe the men should hack off their balls and pour the contents directly into the woman's womb? Or maybe we should let the species go extinct? Get real, people.

    As for the parents who support hacking pornography sites (and aren't the feel-good Christian psychopaths as well), they just want to put their kid's behavior to a stop and are either too lazy or too stupid to look for a solution themselves. (The element of passing the blame comes in too.) They also are probably very self-centered, and have no consideration at all for the rest of the world. Instead, they feel that the webmaster should be responsible for their kid's behavior, because they don't want to interrupt their daytime TV with disciplining their children. I know that not all parents of rowdy children are welfare white-trash, but the same thing applies. If you either can't or won't discipline your children, install a web filter. It's not hard. If they crack it, take the power cord with you to work. Problem solved, and you didn't even have to go to all that trouble to have a hacker deface the site and deny all the honest visitors of it.

    Much of the world actually finds our fussing over sexuality quite humorous. They find it funny that we can't accept the fact that people have sex. They can't believe that we would impeach our President, and allow the whole country to go into an uproar, over something as simple as sex. They find it hilarious that we can't get rid of our Puritan background and get with the modern world. I agree with them. Sex is here, and pornography is here. Neither of them are going to go away. It's time for people to accept it, and move on. The fact that sex such a shameful and taboo thing is ridiculous, and needs to go. People have natural urges. Why should that be such a bad thing?

    Now, I'm not saying that it's OK to run out and screw the first person you see on the street. That is how diseases get spread. It should be performed with somebody you care about and trust. Sex can be a wonderful thing, but only when performed responsibly.

    No, I do not support pedophilia or child pornography.
    No, I'm not a pornography-addict.
    Yes, I am a Christian (and probably on thin ice, too ).

  7. #37
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    484
    So many moral dilemmas. Child Pornography is WRONG. Hacking websites is WRONG. And as everyone knows, two wrongs don't make a right.

    So where does that leave us? We can report this to authorities, but they don't have the time or resources to knock out every single site. Plus there are pictures freely available to download with file sharing places such as KaZaA and Morpheus. Parents can set up filters, but kids can easily defeat them...they usually know more about the computers than the parent does.

    The only way to stop Child Pornography is to not visit the sites. And there are enough perverts out there to prevent this from ever happening.

    Hey HAP, what are your opinions on all that we've said?
    Why am I still here?

  8. #38
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    11
    i feel, the bottom line is

    IT'S WRONG!!
    don't crash a site, unless it's your own site.

    then feel free,
    otherwise
    "thall shalt not **** with that which is not yours"

    happy trails

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •