Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 38

Thread: What do you think about paying to hackers for destroying porno-sites?

  1. #11
    Paying hackers to destroy porn sites? Ummmm, no.

    In addition to being illegal its just plain wrong. Ruining a website because you dont agree with its content is no different than burning a church because you don't agree with what is worshiped there. The way I see it, if you don't want your kid looking at porn, try this: be a damn parent and watch them.
    Ignorance is a voluntary misfortune

  2. #12

    Unhappy

    I'm not really sure how I fall on this. I lean more towards not to hack, but I see some value the other way. One thing is that the person running the porn site will just rebuild it. It is, after all, free speach (as digusting and stupid as it is). You can buy filters for your kids. I would suggest Net Nanny. I would not by Cyber Army, because it is known to cut kids off sites that have different polictical views than its programmers. Well back to the subject. I am a hacker and it is my belief that you should never deface sites. I would like to make it clear that hacking has its good points, and is badly miss-represented. Hacking as it is wrongly known is the art of breaking into computers, pirateing software, defaceing it, and then crashing them. ONLY PUNKS DO THIS IT IS NOT REAL HACKING, JUST JERKS WHO THINK THERE SOMEBODY TO DESTROY PEOPLES STUFF. True hacking is look at the specifications on someones computer and finding what they are running. If you are a real hacker you try and break in, if you do you quickly leave then tell the sysadmin about it so they can secure their site. Hackers are also needed by the government to hack enemy sites, so they can find out valueable information. Hacking and destroying porn, in my humble opinon is WRONG. Besides where in your life if you are a good hacker you might, just might, hack a thousand computers and not get caught --- There will be 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 more sites just like it that people will go to instead.

  3. #13
    AO Antique pwaring's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    1,409
    Porno-sites have just as much right to be on the web as any other sites. The only sites that really deserve to be taken down are child-porn sites (which no-one apart from paedophiles agree with) and sites supporting Bin Laden. Apart from that, the rest is really freedom of speech.
    Paul Waring - Web site design and development.

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    107
    what about kiddy porn? Shouldn't that be attacked?

  5. #15
    AO Antique pwaring's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    1,409
    Originally posted by owen76
    what about kiddy porn? Shouldn't that be attacked?
    Child pornography and paedophiles is the long way of saying kiddy porn.
    Paul Waring - Web site design and development.

  6. #16
    AO Antique pwaring's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    1,409
    Originally posted by owen76
    what about kiddy porn? Shouldn't that be attacked?
    Child pornography and paedophiles is the long way of saying kiddy porn.
    And as I have said before, this is one of the few pieces of material that shouldn't be tolerated. Free speech or not, I doubt anyone on AO agrees with the sexual abuse of children.
    Paul Waring - Web site design and development.

  7. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    681
    I agree that child porn is wrong.... but legal or not, that's the job of the police and such. if hackers attack child porn sites, they are no better then the site admins.... cause it's illegal to hack and child porn is illegal. basically what i am saying is that it's the fbi's job to handle it. by taking matters into your own hands you put yourself at a threat too. and besides, legality of things was not an issue. ethics was the issue. and ethically, it is wrong to hack sites with malicious intent. it gives hackers a bad name. no matter what sites we take down, it'll just make hackers look worse.

    Now here is one interesting site http://www.hackersagainstporno.f2s.com It's an organization that pays to hackers from donations.
    after checking out this site.... i think it's a little shady. it looks to me like it could be a sting operation kind of thing. cause it would kill two birds with one stone. it would let them know about illegal porn sites (that would be destroyed) and let them catch hackers..... i wouldn't play with it.

  8. #18
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    12
    There some other ways if you want to protect your children bout this porno sites and not hacking the site will be a solution.
    which comes first my nick or my attitude....

  9. #19
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    11
    when people learn to grow up and be a ummm what do they call those things, ummmm you know, .the two people who engaged in whats that??? uhhhh pornographic activity to bring you to this planet??? AH YEAH PARENTS. The computer/tv/video game console/ dog/ motorbike ah hell nothin is a substitue. Get a grip on reality. Get a grip on your kids. why destroy someone elses creation? Cause you can? what a lesson to teach your kids. destroy for ye have the power! Sounds like a church i want my family to go to. Most of you guys have a gift some of us can only dream of, don't waste it on this crap. Remember that freedom of speach thinhy? While we use it to post our ramblings here, but we're gonna take it away from somewhere else? and sorry guys, I know I aint gonna win any points here but, that goes for kiddy porn as well. sorry.

  10. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    119

    Exclamation

    Hai........

    Seems to be good.But i think it should be implemented only on those sites which contain child pornos.

    Blackmask



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •