-
December 1st, 2001, 08:48 AM
#11
Personally i prefer 256, without any reason.
-
December 1st, 2001, 08:52 AM
#12
ok ok here are some pro's and con's
good thing about having 1 256MB stick compared to 2 128MB sticks is that you can have more space to add another stick...
bad thing.. is if one stick burns or gets damaged.. you loose 256MB of your mem.. compared to having 2 128MB sticks where if one burns.. you still have 128MB left..
but its all up to you... each has its pro's and con's
-
December 1st, 2001, 09:00 AM
#13
With the clues of sOnIc, i have a reason to have 256 MB and other reason to don't have, but i'm still think that is better the 256MB stick.
-
December 1st, 2001, 09:34 AM
#14
ummm.. yeah.. its really all about personal preference really..
-
December 1st, 2001, 10:28 AM
#15
Oh boy you are genius HAHA.
-
December 1st, 2001, 10:37 AM
#16
Junior Member
put it ALL in there
-
December 1st, 2001, 12:38 PM
#17
Hey shut it up small guy
-
December 1st, 2001, 08:43 PM
#18
Junior Member
Just in case you have not noticed this discussion is over, his or her question has been answered. There is no noticeable deferens between 256 or two separate 128 sticks of ram.
-
October 3rd, 2002, 08:02 PM
#19
some mobo`s dont like syc, buffered, unbuffered ram mixed togther but frequencys dont really matter, but if you run a pc133 beside a pc100, the 133 would run at 100, oh and ive had Pc`s disagreeing with 128 ram, but ran fine with two 64`s, same syc, freq, type, just luck sometimes
keep em crossed
Preep
http://www.attrition.org/gallery/computing/forum/tn/youarenot.gif.html
-
October 3rd, 2002, 08:46 PM
#20
Preep, I admire your determination, answering a question almost a year after the original post
I wish to express my gratitude to the people of Italy. Thank you for inventing pizza.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|