Well,
Let me begin by saying I have been doing studies in computer security. And as you all know, you eventually come to the definition between the "cracker" and "hacker". One definition I liked was;
"A cracker tears things down, a hacker builds them up".

As I pondered on the differences as explained by others; the many sites dedicated to or leaning to one or the other, it was noted that they all contained (in a nutshell):

1. their views
2. their tutorials
3. their forums
4. their victory's

I began to ask myself,

1. what really keeps me in one group and out of the other group.
2. What really is the fine line between a "Hacker" and a "Cracker"?
3. What standard to I use or look to to balance and check myself?

After much thought on this I came to a conclusion based on this:

"What my morals have been based on and schooled by is my standard and guide".

Notice I did not leave it to just my "morals". Because morals can be subjective. But instead, I used a higher standard that my morals were built from.

Whats your opinon? What is the fine line?