Moon Landing A Fake?

[NetSyn]

After reading Remot_access_'s post http://www.antionline.com/showthread...hreadid=203040 on the Paranormal Phenomena it reminded me about sumthin i saw on TV a few times and read some articles on..

Whats this u may ask, well the fact that the moon landing might have been faked and nothing more then a fake moon landing taped on earth by the gov to make us belive that they really went to the moon. Does this sound like its not possible.. well read this info and tell me what u think then..


Lets face it, there isn't really a heapload of evidence that we didn't go to the moon. Why would there be? NASA doesn't WANT evidence that we went to the moon. NASA wants people not to ask questions, and keep living their happy little lives. But here is some evidence that you cannot argue with. My theory is that the moon landing were set on a sound stage, not in space. (Perhaps an Air Force base near San Bernardino, called Norton Air Force Base, where they have the world's largest sound stages under tremendously efficient security).

On the moon, there is only one light source, the sun. Shots of Buzz Aldrin and Neal Armstrong planting the US flag on the moon. If the sun is the only light source used by NASA on the moon, Aldrins shadow shadows should not be so much longer than Armstrong's yet they are by far. http://batesmotel.8m.com/nasa2.gif


if you look in areas 6 and J , you will again see no stars. In area K you will notice that one side of the LEM in covered in shadow, but somehow the symbol of the US flag in illuminated. This very well could have been a touch up job http://batesmotel.8m.com/nasa7.gif




There are many more opinions of how it was a fake. Read here http://batesmotel.8m.com/

_NetSyn_

[hot_ice]

I received an email some weeks ago with a word document attachment that showed all these different pictures of light sources and shadows from the 'apparant' moon landing that make it look like a fake (similar pics to the ones you have links of, but many, many more).

This email got me very interested and I searched the topic up in google (aaah...such a great search engine ) and I found out info that this question - was the moon landing a fake? - has been floating around ever since it happened. Many people have argued that it was fake, by using the pictures, saying that there are too many light sources and shadows are not consistent. One article that I read (I think from the CNN website) said that NASA had argued that they have 'space rocks' and that scientists have tested them and came to the conclusion that they could not have originated from Earth.

Very interesting topic - I wonder what the truth is??

Greg

[tH3#cL3aN3r]

Very good post, if the Moon landings didn't take place, covering that up is one major security job.
My 4 1/2 cents.

Lets face it, there isn't really a heapload of evidence that we didn't go to the moon. Why would there be? NASA doesn't WANT evidence that we went to the moon. NASA wants people not to ask questions, and keep living their happy little lives. But here is some evidence that you cannot argue with. My theory is that the moon landing were set on a sound stage, not in space. (Perhaps an Air Force base near San Bernardino, called Norton Air Force Base, where they have the world's largest sound stages under tremendously efficient security).

The U.S.S.R. would have disputed the U.S.A.'s claim, unless the U.S.S.R. & the U.S. worked something out at the height of the cold war.

On the moon, there is only one light source, the sun. Shots of Buzz Aldrin and Neal Armstrong planting the US flag on the moon. If the sun is the only light source used by NASA on the moon, Aldrins shadow shadows should not be so much longer than Armstrong's yet they are by far.

The Earth will cast reflected light from the Sun onto the moon, as will any light used by the guys there.Then there is light from the Sun & Earth(see above) reflecting of the Lander & other such stuff that would also add to extra weird light.

if you look in areas 6 and J , you will again see no stars. In area K you will notice that one side of the LEM in covered in shadow, but somehow the symbol of the US flag in illuminated. This very well could have been a touch up job http://batesmotel.8m.com/nasa7.gif

No stars, the photogragh's are'nt exposed long enough, You try take a picture of the stars.
Its also daytime on the moon thus the Sun glare will dim the stars a bit.


Then again I may be wrong.

[zepherin]

has anyone ever considered the possibilty that someone just changed a few contrast options in photoshop and resaved it? Might take the better part of 30 minutes

[chsh]

Guys, this debate has been going on for a while, I think it's even a FAQ for sci.physics.astronomy...

Basically, the claims that there are 'too many light sources' are patently wrong, because on the moon, sunlight is a lot stronger.
I'll give you guys some pretty good links, rather than trying to repeat all the points that have been brought up elsewhere.

The one I recommend you all read first is:
http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html
and then the others:
http://pirlwww.lpl.arizona.edu/~jscotti/NOT_faked/
http://asia.cnn.com/2001/TECH/space/02/19/nasa.moon/
http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/apollohoax.html

[Tedob1]

when we go there, hopefully soon, if there's an american flag there, then its settled.

[Guus]

Hehe, you'd probably carve "Tedob1 was here!" in the sand, wouldn't you?

[rcgreen]

I don't think they faked the moon landing,
but today we have such good computer animation
and other image manipulation techniques,
that its only a matter of time before someone
comes up with a really spectacular hoax.

Let's say someone claims he got home video of
a politician messing with under age girl, or taking
money from mafia. People believe what they see.

Even if the hoax is exposed later, what if someone loses
an election over it. You couldn't invalidate an election
just because of a false news story.

[hot_ice]

There are a lot of hoax's going around, especially with UFO sightings. Whenever there is a UFO program running on TV, they always show heaps of footage and say that it was a hoax. Too many people are making fake footage, what's the point? What if one day someone actually does record an actual UFO sighting like a flying sourcer or something? Will we then simply dismiss it as a hoax due to all the fake footage we've previously seen?

Same with people who think they have been abducted by aliens. You just don't know whether to believe them or not. Personally I don't think any of them have been adbucted, I don't think any aliens have come to our planet (yet). But there's just so much of these people, what happens when someone really does get adbucted by aliens, will everyone just assume he/she is crazy?

Greg

[NetSyn]

i wouldnt write sumthin like "NetSyn was here" id write like "I Own J00r M00N" or "Use google.com u idiot" or sumthin on thoes lines


_NetSYn_